I had 5 stages of the interview:
1. Communication with a recruiter
2. Two tasks on algorithms.
(On leetcode, this is the level: easy... maybe medium, but not sure)
3. "Coding Interview" is was just live programming.
The task was also simple. The interview was interesting, I enjoyed it. Thanks to interviewer Artem. It was cool!
4. "Algorithm / Fund Interview" is just a conversation.
Overall, I enjoyed it. But there were questions from the category: "How is var different from let and const"? I was confused and sometimes I didn't understand what position did I apply for? :D
5. Team Fit/Collaboration Interview
The interview was the same as the previous one. I mean, question - answer.
But I didn't like it. The questions were all about soft skils. But they cannot be answered in the abstract or use my expireance, and I think thet intervuer expect correct answer. P.s. Besides, it seems I had the opposite mine on some questions.
Example questions: "What to do if a manager came and said to do something in 3 days", "Who makes decisions about technologies"?
When the interview was close to the end, him phone rang and we immediately finished the interview. I think it was rude...
Throughout the interview, we could not find common ground. I also felt a kind of arrogance (or uncaring, it's hard to say) from the interviewer.
Result:
I got reject because my English is low (it's can be true).
For questions, I also assessed the company. In general, I can recommend it to my friends. Everything will depend on which team they get into. In my opinion, the level of knowledge of the interviewers was different.
