The interview was so long along that I can't recall the exact questions that were asked...only the context. I was asked technical questions about my research during my presentation. I was challenged on my methodology such as study design (recruitmemnt, data collection) and implications of findings. The grilling was similar to what you would expect from a journal reviewer.
The interview started with a 10-minute presentation that I had prepared in advance. Then they asked me to answer the issues raised by the evaluators and then asked about motivation and vision in general.
This role will interact frequently with chemist. As a non chemist how will this effect you? Why should we hire a non chemist for this role?
How do you deal with time pressure and fast pace work environment
1) Please describe the importance of your researcher in the larger scientific context 2) What is innovative or novel about your research proposal ? 3) What are the specific links of your research and the activities of ESA 4) Please provide an example of an important goal which you set for yourself in the past and describe describe some obstacles you had to overcome in order to achieve it 5) You now have 2 minutes to add any further comments you may have
What are your professional interests in the future?
What policies on the floor do you think are most important right now?
How can you make a book out of such studies?
Why are you a good fit for the job? Why do you want the job?
Why do you want to work in this university
Viewing 201 - 210 interview questions