Bloomberg reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(8,214 total reviews)
avatar

Michael R. Bloomberg and Vlad Kliatchko

85% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Bloomberg has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 8,214 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Bloomberg employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
3.0
May 4, 2023

Not the company it used to be

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Incredibly smart and kind colleagues, lots of perks (especially for NYCers).

Cons

As Mike steps back the bureaucracy is gradually eating away at everything that made this company special. I used to feel valued and empowered to make a difference - in the end, I was just a cog. I get the RTO policy, and that’s 100% the company’s right, but it would have been nice if someone in HR or management actually gave a fig when I had to give up a job and team I loved to take care of my family. No ‘thanks for a decade of hard work’, no ‘sorry it turned out this way’, no ‘good luck with your family issues’ - virtually no official communication at all, not even an exit interview. If it weren’t for my immediate supervisors I would have felt like so much garbage dumped at the curb. So incredibly disappointing from a place I once cared about so deeply.

1.0
May 24, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The office has a nice view of the water and Micheal Bloomberg is a great guy

Cons

Let me start by saying my time at Bloomberg did not start off as bad as it eventually got. Once you start off as a "financial analytics" representative they provide you with training which makes you feel like you're learning a lot about finance. In reality they are only teaching you how to use the Bloomberg terminal which is an outdated piece of software from the 80s with an offensive user interface. The name "financial analytics" representative really stands for customer service representative. You work at the help desk. Your entire day is answering tons customer service "tickets" that come into the help desk. There is nothing analytical or financial about this position. When a financial professional comes into the help desk Its your job to search the terminal (most of the time literally searching in the search bar) to find whatever number or news story they are looking for. All you do for 8/9 hours a day is answer help desk questions for clients who 90% of the time are rude and in a hurry for the answer because they value their time much more than yours. Here is where the "toxic" work culture comes from. Every morning that you log in you have a dashboard of your 10+ metrics which are constantly being compared to your coworkers. if your numbers are even percentage lower than your "peer average" prepare to be constantly reminded by your managers to get your customer satisfaction numbers up. Coworkers check each others dashboards to make sure their metrics are better to avoid being in the bottom 10%. Management takes that bottom 10% and will put them on a performance plan and even threaten to terminate their employment. Management uses manipulative tactics to make sure their employees are solving as many "tickets" as humanly possible, like you are a robot. I understand a job can be stressful, I understand that as an employee you are required to perform for the company. But I have never seen a company where people come in and leave with a constant feeling of anxiety that they need to out perform their peers and stretch themselves to a limit to hit metrics. This is not a sales, finance, or analytical job. This is a over the top and extremely stressful customer service job.

3.0
Mar 31, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Insanely profitable business is one of the most eye-popping money making machines you will ever witness, and those riches can be yours, if they like you enough - Willingness to take chances on you, if you succeed, regardless of how young/inexperienced/unqualified you may be on paper; this is great, when you are young and inexperienced, or just lack proper qualifications (no prior sales experience? YOU get to run sales! no business degrees? YOU get to be a COO!) - One of the rare companies where R&D is truly viewed as a profit center, which means your expensive projects with grand scope will usually get approved, even when they shouldn't - The perks are really great, the insurance and benefits are absolute Cadillac grade - you will only find better at a startup with INTERNET money - A lot of the people in the middle and lower ranks of management are actually really good at what they do, work really hard, and can make working there enjoyable

Cons

- Management culture is cult-like, holding loyalty, blood and sweat over real talent and wisdom - Power struggles at the highest levels of the company (most importantly between the CEO and the head of product) tend to have a bigger role in business decisions than actual business - At least a dozen "lifers", who would be utterly unemployable anywhere else, but are worshiped for blood spilled over projects past, hang around in cushy on-the-job retirement positions, billing the company anywhere from $400K-$1.2M annually for jobs that are generally manufactured and pointless ("head of regional businesses", "chief PVF officer") - Core technology stack is so massive and yet painfully old that attempting to modernize it is an asymptotic goal. The great technical genius behind Bloomberg 2, what was supposed to be the future of the company (but will never actually ship), was a plan to move to the latest generation of Windows foundation libraries. Windows in 2012! Recruiting and PR will tell you that Bloomberg is using anything that sounds new and cool and all up in that web stuff. Somewhere, someone is doing that, yes. You won't. If you work in R&D, and if you want to succeed and earn the trust and respect of your peers, you will work on C, maybe some C++, and you will at least see Fortran if not change it. And it won't be good C code. It will be the kind of C code that reads "int one = 2;", written by unskilled recent college graduates that were mentored by managers with history majors. - Uncle Mike's money spigot runs so fast and hard that managers on the product side are rarely held accountable for failures. With 85% of your revenue coming from a single, huge product sold on a flat price model, how do you measure success? The answer always ends up being some bogus metrics, which the good managers will figure out how to juke and/or just magically explain away while proposing next year's bigger, even more expensive plan, that will not only correct the mistakes of last year's plan but also introduce MORE, GLORIOUS MISTAKES. - Severe violation of personal space, this culture has decided that your acceptance is conditional upon their complete and total ownership of your being. Even the most minute discrepancies in your schedule must be reported (publicly) and explained away; all work is logged and diced into spreadsheets put under constant scrutiny; all tickets (and there are zillions of them) go through piles and piles of approvals and re-routing; transparency is taken to an extreme that is disrespectful and psychologically abusive at times.

Viewing 37 - 39 of 8,214 Reviews

Glassdoor has 10,055 Bloomberg reviews submitted anonymously by Bloomberg employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bloomberg is right for you.