Lackluster Bank - Associate BNP Paribas Employee Review

2.0
Aug 21, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

OK base pay. Access to resouces if you know how to use them. Senior managers and bankers cared about junior staff.

Cons

Executive management lacks vision. Some managers spent more trying to one up each other rather than developing junior staff. As a result, junior staff were inadequate and lacked skills to provide meaningful contributions. A few staff carried weight of the entire team, and did not receive sufficient compensation to do so. Bonuses were same for incompetent analysts who worked half a year and for associates who pulled majority of the weight. Middle Management was highly ineffective and most of the time an impediment ti completing work. Absolutely toxic environment with no collaboration across departments. Constant backstabbing and people trying to take credit for others' work. Too many chefs throwing up in the kitchen when it came to policy making. Policies lacked understanding of basic finance, constantly changed and were confusing. Bank is pouring resources into underperforming divisions. Cannot compete with US Banks. Awkward structure, where "pitchbook" staff are more respected than analytical staff.

Explore other reviews about BNP Paribas

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

love working here been here 4 years

Cons

return to office policy is tough

1.0
May 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only good thing about this place were the Nespresso machines.

Cons

I rarely leave reviews, but future job seekers deserve fair warning. From day one, it was clear that micromanagement was a core operating principle here; not a quirk, but a feature. Managers routinely hovered over routine tasks, demanded pointless status updates multiple times a day, constantly changed directives, took credit for my work, and treated experienced professionals like they couldn't be trusted to send an email unsupervised. Any sense of autonomy was purely cosmetic. The culture was equally poisonous. Gossip wasn't background noise; it was practically a department function. Colleagues regularly spoke poorly of one another behind closed doors, cliques formed and hardened fast, and if you weren't part of the right group, you felt it. Unkind doesn't begin to cover it. Basic professionalism and common decency were in short supply. Management set the tone for all of it. Leaders who should have modeled integrity instead participated in the drama, played favorites openly, and addressed conflict with either complete avoidance or outright retaliation. HR was not a resource — it was a shield for bad behavior at the top. I left for my own sanity. The turnover rate here should tell you everything. Life is too short and your career too important to spend either in an environment like this one.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All