Good place to work for junior soso sor seniors - Senior Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
Jul 17, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- good culture and good poeple to work with must of the time. - capgemini offers a lot of certification for learners their is an annual budget dedicated by the group for it good balance life/work if you don't adhere to the need of animating alot of workshop in schools or others

Cons

evolution is tricky after grade B, technically a lot of argument can be relied to your Carrier manager, that value and focus solely on the visibility of the individual on the top management accomplichement made for capgemini without any consideration of the client satisfaction or project success. a lot of processes have being made and confirmed with Fr management to somehow adjust the process of evoluation. however in practice, the process is simply tailor made and not respected if a worker decide to leave, if they have someone on top management grade D+ that can defend its case. bad balance life/work if you follow top management advise and focus on animating many time consuming external events. also note that capgemini rabat is considered as an extension and in this regard employes doesn't have the same evolution ratio compared to Casablanca , also the information is badly managed from top down regarding privileges or formation, generaly rabat will have the information only by selected few

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All