Great in general, but can vary on team/manager - Software Development Engineer II Expedia Group Employee Review

4.0
Aug 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Many great, experienced staff that are happy to share knowledge * Opportunities for career growth (can vary by team, but most I've seen have people moving teams and changing titles) * Loyalty: People often stay 10+ years and don't regret it as far as I can tell * Fun "on brand" benefits (Travel and wellness benefits, 20% off partnered hotels through Expedia's main sites, those can be used together!) * Vacation time, while not a ton is given, is sacrosanct: I've never had a request questioned even in the slightest, it was an automatic "Oh, sure, go ahead!" given I always gave advance notice * Chill work environment with reasonable and relatively even workload, especially compared to the biggest game in town (Amazon) * In my experience, management is friendly, helpful, and talking up to the director level is frictionless as an SDE II

Cons

* Ironically, that sacrosanct vacation time means managers and co-workers often mess with stuff like deadlines or deployment schedules around popular times * Compensation can be a little "meh" compared to competitors, still livable in Seattle even for an SDE I/II * Many of the Pros depends on your team and manager, I see some issues or spats on Blind. I cannot corroborate those in my personal experience at all but I figure it's gonna happen somehow

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- good benefits - depending on team great culture

Cons

Not every team is the same

2.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All