Big company & amazing IBM transformation - Client Solutions Executive IBM Employee Review

5.0
Jan 20, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The shift from a hardware-centric to service-centric and now to a cloud and cognitive service model. A transformation of this kind is not easy for any company with more than 75,000 employees let alone 400,000 that IBM has world-wide. Google reports at 57,000, Apple around than 80,000, Blackberry/RIM at 7000 (at its peak) to put into perspective. Blackberry led the market was too comfortable and failed to transform to market demands. Many, many of the leaders and executives at IBM have Engineering, Computer Science backgrounds - they aren't your typical no-work experience MBAs. They make decisions very analytically (as Engineers tend to do) with their clients in mind trying to help solve business and world problems. That problem was once mainframes, servers, storage and systems; evolved to implementing and building IT solutions around that hardware; now it's an hybrid cloud implement-yourself-slash-business-service. Very few companies own the entire ecosystem (mainframe, business solutions and cloud availability) - IBM does. The cognitive guys can request improvements and features to the hardcore engineering server CPU team for maximum optimization- making the most advance system easily available to all businesses. No doubt, IBM is years ahead the competition with their Watson Services and it's built on an ecosystem that is in line with the CIOs and CTOs initiative going into the future. The platform also lends well to startups and smaller companies being able to leverage and take advantage of IBM's top-notch enterprise and industry services at flexible, scalable and affordable rates. This is new ground for IBM that was typically reserved for big firms and enterprise companies. Way to go, IBM!

Cons

Old sellers not willing to adapt to what the industry is demanding will have a tough transition. Again, 400,000 employees makes it difficult for any company. People can get comfortable and changing becomes difficult. Again, Blackberry/RIM is evidence of being the smart phone leader who failed to transform and was just barely saved from a bankruptcy by being acquired for pennies on the dollar. Again, Jim Balsillie, former CEO of Balckberry, had no engineering or computer science background, and tried to run the company solely with his Harvard MBA, which he ran into the ground. IBM has a lot of work to transform a lot of people who are more comfortable doing things the old way.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Relocation bonus and welcoming team

Cons

Very large and corporate at times

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All