Good company - Devops Engineer Infosys Employee Review

3.0
Jun 30, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good company for both freshers and experienced ones

Cons

Good onsite opportunities should be there

avatar
Infosys Response
3y
Thank you for your review. We welcome all types of feedback, as our team is always looking for ways to improve. We appreciate your comments regarding onsite opportunities. We are sorry you feel this negatively impacted your experience. We invite all team members to use our internal resolution hubs, such as HEAR, to address their concerns. Thank you for being part of the Infosys team!

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Jul 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good company to work for. Good work life

Cons

Benefits shoulf be better. Need a transition.

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All