Bait & Switch - Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
Nov 10, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Steady employment / not a lot of layoffs Somewhat flexible schedule Every other Friday off

Cons

Most jobs are bait & switch — no one on my team thought they would be doing the work they are doing. I hear the same from other groups. I have applied and interviewed for 4 different roles here and each role had completely different tasks/assignments/responsibilities than what was discussed and or posted on the job listing. Access and equipment issues are constant problems. Either you don’t have (working) equipment, the software, the software licenses to do what you need to do or you don’t have the access/permissions to do what you need to do. By the time all of this is sorted out, the task is over/dumped and it’s on to a new task with these same issues. Bottle necking of work — many people with little to do or are waiting on data to go forward. See people online all day or talking / not busy. Then there are a few people who the work bottlenecks through and they are always swamped and work crazy hours. Poor communication — upper level will know it needs certain info or tasks done weeks ahead of time and won’t mention it until a week or even sometimes a day or two before it’s due, then mention it. After people work / stay late, holidays, weekends trying to complete something they should have had weeks to do, the results are trashed or not looked at and this happens a lot.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, interesting and engaging work

Cons

Career growth, Bureaucracy, lack of accountability

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All