Fairly Typical Large Defense Company - Principal Systems Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

4.0
Mar 7, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Typical pros of a large company: - Lots of room for career growth - Wide variety of projects to work in - Wide variety of locations to work at and travel to (including internationally) - Fairly stable work backlog Typical pros of a defense company: - Military projects can be very interesting - Projects can literally result in lives saved - Clearance is valuable

Cons

Typical cons of a large company: - Individual achievement can get lost in the noise - Lots of ways for people who coast to hide - Lots of smoke and mirrors between different layers of leadership - Peter Principle is in full effect - Inter-organizational politics frequently get in the way of getting work done - Easy to get lost in the organization without a mentor - Tribal knowledge is a big issue due to lack of tools and processes to properly capture and maintain that knowledge Typical cons of a defense company: - Government incompetence and bureaucracy is an ever persistent hurdle - A lot of defense work is on existing systems and platforms, which can be severely constraining in everything from the tools you have, to the final product that you can expect to deliver (expect to work with the "cutting edge" of tech up to half a century old) - Projects can be shorthanded while people wait for access, access that may never come - Not everything you learn in defense world will translate to commercial due to the bespoke nature of the industry (granted, it's bespoke for good reason) - Work-from-home can be absolutely non-existent depending on how much of your program is classified work

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
Apr 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Pay and Great Benefits

Cons

Bonuses could be better for everyone.

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All