NG is extremely mediocre as far as DoD contractors go - Staff Analyst Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
Jul 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-9/80 Schedule if that's the type of schedule you prefer over flex time -Job security has been relatively stable as NG is a sole source provider on many contract, meaning they basically get non-compete contracts from DoD -Decent 401k match, options for you to invest in anything you want on the market rather than a set of fixed funds

Cons

-NG pay raises never keep up with inflation. Negotiate your salary first before coming here, because average employees get 2-3%, high performers get 3-4% if you're lucky. The longer you stay the more underpaid you are -Promotions are non existent. You must change jobs or leave the company to get a true promotion -Return to work. NG used to tout itself as a flexible employer, but they're course corrected hard and are forcing employees into offices 5 days a week. That includes employees that have worked remotely for over 5-10 years. Despite owning several of their properties and not paying a lease, the dinosaur management is insistent work must be performed on site, even though they've posted record profits while having employees work remotely for half a decade. The worst part is that the on site requirement is combined with hours over 40 a week. They have no respect for work/life balance despite them claiming they due. Even for internal reviews and deadlines they are extremely unflexible. They have an expectation that you work on holidays as well; they put out internal schedules for Finance and Accounting each month whereby deadlines include holidays. Don't believe a word they say about work/life balance, when push comes to shove they will through you under the bus for trying to stand up for yourself and your personal time/commitments -Nepotism. If you read through reviews of NG here, you'll notice a trend that nepotism is frequently mentioned. It's because it's true: if you're at a NG site that's been around for more than a few decades, you will notice employees related to each other, best buddies from college/high school, etc, even working in the same department. It is extremely unprofessional and they treat it like it's normal because many people have never worked anywhere else in their career at these legacy sites -Culture: an employee departed recently and in his exit interview claimed that he had never seen any other employer that had such a "hall monitor" culture as NG. Employees will walk around the offices all day spying on one another, seeing who is or isn't in the office, etc, and report it up to their management. The management has a high school gossip mentality, and I have seen numerous examples of them sharing employees' medical history issues with other employees (despite that being illegal under the FMLA). An employee at a site in MD recently passed away at the actual site from overwork and stress. NG tried to course correct hard but putting out numerous communications saying mental health matters to them: and then within a matter of weeks was sending out mandates forcing employees back into the office, and still forcing certain departments to work late nights/weekends/holidays. Again, don't believe a word of it, it's all lip service. -They are an old school good old boys club. Discrimination for gender and race run rampant. Extremely unprofessional comments are frequently said in the workplace; HR takes no action whatsoever on these. The "nail that stands up gets hammered down" mentality is alive and well at NG. If you come in as a new hire and try and offer new ideas on your role or function, you will be met with extreme negativity. -Bloated upper management. NG is the most unfocused Finance function I have ever seen in this industry. They require an enormous plethora of reports and reviews every month, and have no focus on exactly what financial metrics matter to them. Instead they ask for reports and variance reports upon variance reports, with no guidance as to what or doesn't truly matter to them, it's all on a whim. The upper management is so bloated you have people holding reviews to prep for their reviews with their management because they need to prep for their reviews with their management. Entire layers of middle management could be removed and it wouldn't impact business operations whatsoever. Even asking a simple question such as "I have two tasks to work on right now. Which is the priority?" The answer from management is always "both". Most managers are just pass throughs for their upper management and will never challenge their own management or stand up for their employees. They will 100% say one thing to your face and turn around and do the opposite. Do not trust anyone in management here, very two faced and insincere.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
Apr 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The engineers are good and helpful

Cons

No cons for my experience

3.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job security, nearly impossible to get laid off, Hours for most people are consistent, generally a good benefits package. You are able to jump around laterally within the company very easily. Once you get to T3 and above the salary becomes decent for prime standards. Easy, almost non-existent interviews.

Cons

Not moving fast enough in the current defense market. Lots of red-tape. Turnover at specific sites are insanely high. Promotions take forever and the increase in salary is minimal. They don't care about retention. They will let you walk and give your replacement a sign-on bonus and a higher salary. There are a lot of slackers and old timers riding it out till retirement. Only about a 1/3 of this site is actually productive. Yes-men get into management and ignore technical experts. Agile hiring is a huge issue where people are just thrown onto random teams. Easy, almost non-existent interviews allow people without relevant backgrounds to join teams. Every site operates completely differently.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All