When is the testing department going to close? - Senior Quality Engineer Trayport Employee Review

There's a growing sense of disconnect between the organization's priorities and the realities faced by the testing team. While the company may be achieving its targets, the testing process appears to be consistently undervalued and under-resourced, leading to a palpable sense of burnout amongst testers, and i've seen it affect their health. Testers are feeling the strain of last-minute requests, insufficient preparation time, and a lack of involvement in early planning stages. This often leads to unrealistic deadlines and a constant need to context-switch between multiple projects, hindering productivity and contributing to a feeling of overwhelm and exhaustion. This pressure-cooker environment, coupled with the constant struggle of dealing with broken test environments and deployments, often results in avoidable bugs slipping through the cracks, impacting the overall quality of releases. Adding to the frustration is the lack of investment in the testing team's growth and development. Outdated tools and environments, a significant reduction in automation coverage, and limited opportunities for professional development all contribute to a sense of stagnation. The inefficiency is further compounded by a lack of proper tooling for test setup, which results in significant time wasted on manually configuring environments instead of focusing on actual testing. This is further compounded by a perceived lack of recognition, with testers feeling undervalued compared to other roles in terms of promotions, salary increases, and general support, especially when there's a big hiring push in London for testers, offering more pay and better conditions. This lack of recognition is pervasive and deeply felt. Testers feel invisible, their contributions routinely overlooked and rarely acknowledged, especially in public celebrations of project successes. Their departmental leadership appears disengaged and unsupportive, only interacting with the team when problems arise. This sense of being undervalued is further amplified by the disparity in resourcing, with some development teams lacking dedicated testers altogether – a decision that has demonstrably negative consequences for product quality. This dissatisfaction has reached a critical point, with multiple testers openly expressing their intention to leave at the start of 2025 if conditions don't improve. This potential exodus of valuable talent underscores the urgency of addressing the challenges faced by the testing team. It's believed that a greater understanding of these challenges, perhaps through direct involvement in the testing process, would help bridge the gap and foster a more collaborative and supportive environment.