Global Blue reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(261 total reviews)
avatar

Jacques Stern

80% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Global Blue has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 261 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Global Blue employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzen industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

261 reviews
1.0
Apr 4, 2026

Run

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I honestly don't see any

Cons

Toxic environment, mobbing, agressive, low pay

4.0
Jan 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible working hour Good environment

Cons

No cons very thing is good

avatar
Global Blue Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We’re glad to hear that you appreciate the flexibility and positive working environment at Global Blue. Creating a workplace where people feel comfortable and supported is something we truly value. It’s great to know that your experience has been so positive so far — thank you for being part of the team.
1.0
Jan 5, 2026

The Singapore office reflects poor leadership and excessive control

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The central and regional teams outside Singapore are professional, supportive, and collaborative. Colleagues from other markets were consistently willing to help, share best practices, and support initiatives related to the Singapore business. However, over time, frequent last minute and unreasonable requests from the Singapore office placed strain on these working relationships. This led to reduced engagement and willingness from regional counterparts to support Singapore driven initiatives.

Cons

This is one of the worst working environments I have experienced in an international company. In the Singapore office, the commercial function operates under an extremely local management structure, where nearly all decisions, approvals, and actions are controlled by the Country Manager. In practice, this results in heavy micromanagement and very limited autonomy for the team. There is little room for trust. Even during work from home arrangements, I observed management checking in on staff to confirm physical presence at the computer rather than focusing on outcomes or results. Decision making is largely top down, with minimal effort to gather feedback from the ground or understand operational challenges faced by the team. Work life boundaries are poorly respected. Expectations extend beyond normal working hours, including weekends, personal time, and even periods of approved leave. Availability is often assumed rather than discussed, which makes it difficult to sustain a healthy balance between work and personal life. The office culture is also concerning. Administrative support staff play an informal monitoring role, observing and reporting on employee behavior such as arrival times, phone usage, and conversations. This creates an environment where people feel watched rather than supported, and discourages open communication. Team dynamics are heavily influenced by tenure. Several long serving employees appear to hold informal power, while junior staff receive limited guidance, psychological safety, or mentorship. As a result, turnover among newer hires is high, with many leaving within a short period of time. All communication and information sharing requires caution. There is a general sense that conversations can be relayed upward without context, which makes collaboration and trust within the team difficult to build. Compensation is not competitive relative to workload and expectations. Long hours are normalized, and efficiency suffers due to excessive approval layers and lack of delegation. Despite being part of a global organization, the Singapore office operates in a way that feels outdated and resistant to modern working practices. Overall, this environment may suit individuals who are ready to retire. For those who value trust, professional growth, collaboration, and sustainable working hours, this is a place to avoid.

avatar
Global Blue Response
2mo
We appreciate you sharing such a comprehensive perspective on your experience. We are sorry to hear that your time in the Singapore office did not reflect the environment we aim to provide at Global Blue. Ensuring a culture based on trust, collaboration, and respect is a priority for us globally, and it is concerning to read feedback that suggests gaps in these areas. It is encouraging, however, to see your recognition of the professionalism and support from our regional and central teams, as this reflects an important part of how we operate as an international organization. Your comments regarding leadership approach, communication, decision-making processes, and work-life balance are noted and taken seriously. We continuously invest in developing our leaders and improving ways of working to better support our teams and foster an inclusive, open, and sustainable workplace. Thank you again for taking the time to provide such detailed feedback — it is valuable in helping us identify areas where we can continue to improve.
Viewing 4 - 6 of 261 Reviews

Glassdoor has 374 Global Blue reviews submitted anonymously by Global Blue employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Global Blue is right for you.