Google reviews

4.4

87% would recommend to a friend

(48,387 total reviews)
avatar

Sundar Pichai

82% approve of CEO

81% positive business outlook

Google has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 48,387 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Google employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

48K reviews
4.0
Dec 10, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The benefits of Google are undeniable - health care coverage, time off, food, the amazing people you encounter, you name it.

Cons

The biggest issue I had with Google (and the main reason I left the company) was the lack of transparency they had in the promotion process and moving laterally across the company. As a company that boasts about transparency...this was pretty embarrassing. If you join the company in say, sales, it's exceptionally challenging to move to another section of the company (ex: marketing). My recruiter also lied and told me I could transfer offices after a year. He didn't mention I'd have to find a new position in order to do so.

1.0
Feb 3, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-The Google name opens doors. -Nice people for the most part. -Benefits and perks.

Cons

-Most employees are miserable. The golden handcuffs keep people there. -Diversity and inclusion are just buzz words. They have no clue how to achieve either. -If you speak up about inequality too much or too loudly they will find ways to push you out. Creating a culture of gaslighting, discrimination and structurally reinforced racism. -Many employees are suffering in silence as a result. -Most of the leadership have sold their souls for a paycheck.

2.0
Jan 30, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Context: gTech team - Perks, benefits and pay (if those are important to you; they aren't as impactful to most as they think in the long run and create an over-privileged, ungrateful workforce) - Travel and freebies opportunities - Looks good on a CV/outside perception strong - Flexibility in working hours/how you manage your time - Clubs and talks, volunteering opportunities - Stable company

Cons

Context: gTech team - Still too US (Silicon Valley) focused. Incompatible culture with Europe mindsets - Still culturally tailored to 20 something privileged (Ivy league) males e.g. having to share hotel rooms at most events, expecting people to want to relocate, and assuming everyone is the same in terms of motivations and beliefs - BIG ethical problems- see news - Management are very poor: low EQ, lots of turnover/infighting, just care about results not people. Don't like it when people question them even though they say the opposite- lack integrity and many are bullies or just keep their heads down and do nothing. - Many people are managed by people several timezones away leading to poor communications and relations. Fundamental misunderstandings arise because there is an assumption, by the US mainly, that because people speak English they share a culture. - People are very competitive, arrogant, and selfish, don't care about each other as people due to low EQs and being over-privileged or insecure. A person can faint or breakdown in tears in a meeting and everyone will just ignore them. - Low internal mobility if you want to stay in London- it's very competitive and if you enter a bad role/team and have bad projects, it's near impossible to transfer, especially because you need your manager to help. Getting stuck is easy; HR are no help. - Low trust in HR and Employee Relations- so much sexism, ageism and mental health discrimination. Google keeps paying people to keep quiet. HR are near useless (by their own admission) because they have no power. Again, see news. - Company is classic large corp now- ruled by middle managers empire building. Historical culture is not really present anymore, e.g. no 20% projects allowed. - Work is meaningless- little control over strategy, repeating past projects/mistakes, impact of deliverables questionable as they are politically driven more than anything. - Work is still technically driven and people who bring project management experience are not well respected as they are seen as an unnecessary overhead and remind people that Google is now a large company and cannot support old practices such as one to ones with everybody and informal knowledge transfer. - Lots of big company politics and constant problems with delivery because company is still technically driven rather than people/process/organisation driven - Internal systems/tools not fit for purpose unless you are an engineer. Refusal/arrogance-led negative attitudes to using external tools such as JIRA or project management tools. Everyone just uses Google Suite for everything- with some hacky tools built on top sometimes. - Lots of internal snobbery over working for gTech- little respect or knowledge from the rest of Google - Interview system is ridiculously complicated, and has tons of bias, and doesn't recruit the people needed due to the abstract coding questions that people need to answer to prove that they are "technical" even when the job doesn't require coding. You therefore end up with people who want to code in jobs where they aren't required to code which causes a lot of problems.

Viewing 181 - 183 of 48,387 Reviews

Glassdoor has 70,223 Google reviews submitted anonymously by Google employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Google is right for you.