Hopper Software Developer reviews

3.2

5% would recommend to a friend

(25 total reviews)
avatar

Frederic Lalonde

69% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Software Developer employees have rated Hopper with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 25 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Software Developer professionals have a good working experience there. Hopper is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Software Developer professionals compared to other employers within the Hotel & Unterbringung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

25 reviews
2.0
Jul 20, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Remote-first. For this, I'm giving more than 1 star. Hopper was one of the better employers I've worked with that committed to fully remote. As a result, my teammates are very smart people because of the larger talent pool, and not having to commute is a big plus. * Macbook Pro. Coding on anything else sucks. * Google Enterprise. Google Meet, Google Cloud Platform, Google Calendar, Google Slides. It's all quite nice and high quality relative to Microsoft environments. * $200/year annual travel perk. * Some middle management is reasonable, and some teams are well insulated from chaos elsewhere in the company. Middle management with more tenure is a good indicator of managers who can push back against upper management's often unreasonable demands. * Honestly good healthcare benefits. BCBS was solid. Mat and Pat leave was good. Lack of 401k match, gym benefits for US employees, or higher base salary is a big miss among an otherwise competitive package.

Cons

1. Management is rampant with toxic bullies and only cares about short-term revenue gains. Seriously, just have a friend whose opinion you trust use the app to research and book some form of travel before you join. Upper management can and will abruptly change your team's priorities if a cow farts in Kansas. 2. Lots of sycophants. Look that up if you don't know what it is. 3. Bloated tech and legacy code, due to prioritizing immediately needed quick hits over sensible long-term roadmaps with ample time for good engineering and code review. Why does this happen? See Point 1. 4. Stole Amazon's culture and leadership principles, but only selectively employs them when its convenient. Claims "leaders are right, a lot", but when leaders are wrong, they just fire all the underlings. Only ICs are expected to truly admit "ownership" over their mistakes. 5. Seeing good teammates get fired, often, for no compelling reason, with no warning to other teammates who might rely on them. 6. Remote work-life balance isn't well-enforced. On-call is frustrating. Unlimited PTO is just a way to not have to pay you out for what would usually be accrued time off. 7. Long tenure employees aren't necessarily the most reasonable bunch. Think about Points 1-5. If you experience all that, and stick it out, what kind of person does that then select for? Flip side of this is favoritism can work in your favor if someone with tenure likes you, and that then shields some of the BS from up top. 8. Pressure to sometimes do wrong by the customer to make more money. Have a moral compass. 9. Product (Management) is king. Devs have often made product suggestions, based on their own experience and user feedback in company Slack channels. We often don't get taken seriously, even though we work and use the product all the time. C-suite or other upper management (See Point 2) usually jumps in and bullies those who speak up. Customer Support Agents have to clean up the mess of a convoluted ever-changing user experience. C-suite will never admit to being wrong. Data is used to support their pre-existing narrative and world view, but not to call it into question. 10. Graphic Design is used to cover up the above. The bunnies are cute and friendly. Hopper's culture and product is not. 11. Lack of diversity. Customer Support Agents are the most diverse part of the company. This leads to lack of intellectual diversity, creating echo chambers that result in the issues above.

2.0
Jul 5, 2023

What a mess

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Worked with some smart people - There is a lot of autonomy despite a lot of the cons below

Cons

Hopper really makes individual contributors feel like miserable peons and the management is so fickle and crazy you never know what to expect. Hopper puts a lot of pressure on ICs to produce, and yet don't show a lot of gratitude for your smart, innovative and hard work. Seriously, I have seen some people really go above and beyond on project after project, only to be let go on the whim of someone in management. And in one very visible instance, management decided to let go a huge chunk of talented staff, only to reverse course less than a year later and hire people back into that part of the business (of course they didn't bother trying to re-hire the people they let go though). The work is diverse enough to be somewhat interesting, but honestly its not worth the pain and lack of security, and good luck to you if you have to work directly with someone in management.

1.0
Jun 27, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall, my experience as an employee at Hopper has been far from satisfactory. The laughable equity program, the lack of originality in policies, the questionable product offerings, and the arrogant leadership have left me disillusioned. I would caution anyone considering a career at Hopper to carefully evaluate their priorities and ambitions before joining a company that seems more interested in cost-cutting and imitation than in fostering a thriving and innovative work environment..

Cons

As a current employee at Hopper, I feel compelled to share my disappointments and frustrations regarding the company. While there are a few positives, such as the option to work from home (WFH), the cons heavily outweigh any benefits I have experienced. One of the major drawbacks of working at Hopper is the joke of an equity program. Despite promises of potential financial gains, employees are only allowed to vest a measly 3% of their vested shares. This lack of equity distribution significantly diminishes the incentives for employees to stay with the company and work towards its success. It seems that Hopper is more interested in hoarding the majority of the equity for themselves rather than rewarding their hardworking employees. Furthermore, it is disheartening to discover that Hopper's policies are essentially copied and pasted from Amazon. Originality and independent thinking are vital in the tech industry, yet Hopper seems content with mimicking the practices of a larger competitor. This lack of innovation raises concerns about the company's ability to stand out in a highly competitive market. Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Hopper is its major product, Price Freeze, which is nothing more than a scam. AI language model, such as ChatGPT, could easily replace this supposedly groundbreaking feature. It is disheartening to work for a company that relies on deceptive tactics to lure customers, rather than providing genuinely valuable and innovative solutions. Note : There are several pending lawsuits about this product

Viewing 10 - 12 of 25 Reviews

Glassdoor has 468 Hopper reviews submitted anonymously by Hopper employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hopper is right for you.