IBM reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(107,070 total reviews)
avatar

Arvind Krishna

76% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

IBM has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 107,070 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IBM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

107K reviews
4.0
May 1, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Recognized world wide, still a symbol of prestige. -Lots of opportunities to switch within. -Starts off with good pay. -Will put you in challenging positions which is great for learning.

Cons

-Lengthy, painful and often completely useless processes attached with every single thing. -Thousands of different initiatives. Not enough time to properly commit to any. -Very slow salary growth. Barely keeps up with inflation. -Not concerned with efficiency. -Ridiculous lack of commitment to goals and rapid switching around to new roles.

4.0
Apr 3, 2017

Good News / Bad News

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Scope of company means you can do many things - lots of opportunity to learn new skills, if you're willing to relocate and learn. 2) Interesting work and a variety of people and cultures 3) Good benefits 4) Cutting-edge technology

Cons

1) Direction at the top of the company is poor. Not much confidence in the top execs. 2) Too much focus on cost-side of the equation, a result of poor revenues for many quarters. 3) Shoemakers children with technology for employees - i.e., 4-year cycle for laptop replacement, not a lot of internal Mac support, poor local support for IT issues. 4) Push for 'co-location' after years of allowing work-at-home means many people are commuting long distances to a few sites to keep their jobs.

avatar
IBM Response
8y
IBM has been a pioneer in new approaches to work as our business model changes. For a number of job roles (like developers, marketing, designers), working at home is balanced against the need for more rapid, iterative innovation and co-creating with our clients and end users. It's why we have invested so heavily in the agile training, the tools and the modernized agile workspaces (around 7 million square feet in agile) to accommodate how IBMers are working. For example, developers are working side by side with colleagues who design, others who focus on user experience, analytics and data science, just to name a few. We're leaning into agile across our business with self-directed, smaller teams. So while we have asked around 3% of our North America workforce in specific jobs to join colleagues already working in agile hubs, we are still committed to trust and workplace flexibility - whether that's to accommodate personal appointments or our kids' soccer matches or work from home when needed.
1.0
Sep 26, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Team building: You are forced into this situation as there is nothing provided to direct you as an employee to an answer. It does build a skill of self reliance and independence, if you survive

Cons

IBM has outsourced so many divisions, including its own HR department, to India and other countries that customers are lied to in the name of profits. Customer facing positions are being relocated to India and customers are "assured" that they will not be impacted. IBM's greed is so excessive that profit margins are demanded from project managers in the neighborhood of 50%. If you cannot produce those kinds of results, they will find a way to get rid of first, half your staff, then you, then either boggle the job so bad that the customer seeks other service bids, and they gives the impression, "well we tried". The technical staff is core unit the customer sees in most cases. Relationships must be developed to keep these customers happy. IBM has torn apart the service staff to the point of hiring completely unskilled labor for $10-12 hr, while stating the idea that you can guide anyone through this kind of work. WRONG! This unskilled labor is usually a "3rd sub" from a company they spun off a few years ago called Qualixserv, in some cases Manpower. This staff is told that they are not to disclose to the customer that they are not employees. Merely to say that they are "John/Jane Doe for IBM". Project teams are facing customers who are discovering this and demanding that if they cannot provide IBM direct employees that they are not to send anyone to the customer PERIOD. We are preached to on a daily basis that it costs more to generate new business than to retain it. But each day we are encouraged to walk away from our customers, "just under the radar", or lying to the point that it requires the entire team to have several meetings, just to prepare for a meeting with the customer when the s*&% hits the fan.

Viewing 67 - 69 of 107,070 Reviews

Glassdoor has 131,445 IBM reviews submitted anonymously by IBM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IBM is right for you.