Kearney reviews

3.9

66% would recommend to a friend

(2,216 total reviews)
avatar

Bob Willen

61% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Kearney has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 2,216 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Kearney employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Beratung industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
5.0
Oct 21, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people, the people, the people. ATK people are strong intellectually, and just great people to get to know and to work with. Which is a good thing, because you will be working side by side with them, for long periods of time and generally in pretty crap locations... That said, people are too quick to dismiss ATK as an operational consulting shop. There is a lot of really cutting-edge strategy work happening here: we just don't market ourselves as effectively as the Big Three, nor do we have as strong as a brand. Personally, I have only done one pure operations project since I started here three years ago. The balance of my time: marketing strategy (Consumer products), growth strategy (integrated oil producer), innovation and NPD (finance), and G&A transformation (apparel retail). So ATK definitely can offer industry and functional variety. Another pro is its leadership at the top. Laudicina is a visionary.

Cons

Travel: Travel is non-stop, continuous, and burdensome on the soul. That said, all consultants travel all the time, but ATK is likely worse than some (Bain, BCG) and at par with others (Booz, Mck). A lot can be done to manage client expectations around this issue, and to optimize staffing for life as well as work. Processes: ATK is an 80 year old start-up. AFter the 2005 buyout, the firm started from scratch. So we are still building core processes. Examples: We have pretty mediocre intellectual capital develpoment, dissemination processes and tools, pretty crap financial management at the partnership level (a pareto of partner contribution would reveal a long tail, i suspect), and not the strongest people review processe (although its getting better).

2.0
Oct 20, 2009

Practical, yet mind-numbingly uninteresting

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Down-to-earth people, yet also friendly, pragmatic, and smart - A genuine interest, at manager level, to improve junior consultants' performance - Plenty (almost too much) face time with the client - "Green" initiatives being employed at most offices in North America - Offices are very open; partners usually have an open-door policy

Cons

- Simply put, the firm's outlook is horrible. Its hiring strategy in 2009 indicates that the firm is way off-base when it comes to establishing workforce targets and effectively projecting workloads over the next year. - Workload is brutal (~70+ hours), and the client locations aren't much to shake a stick at (want to spend a summer in central Kentucky?) - "Global firm" model means that you could be travelling across the street for a client or across the country on a red-eye; lots of variability - Virtually zero strategy work; it's all sourcing, cost reduction, and IT work at this point - Creativity is simply not valued. A lot of ATK's intellectual capital (which is fantastic) is almost used as a crutch in client engagements - Establishing a positive rapport with the client is frowned upon - Review processes are opaque

3.0
Oct 18, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people - almost everyone is pretty nice and approachable, even up to top level management Work can be interesting - depends on the project but there are some interesting projects that come up from time to time Good reputation - It is respected by top business schools and other consulting firms in the industry Plenty of national travel - Though this gets tiring pretty quick

Cons

Long hours - Depending on the project or manager your life could be horrible. Often there are excuses given as to why the particular project you're on is "abnormally" intense, but if you talk to enough employees you will find that almost all of them have had one or multiple horrible projects, it is not a particularly rare occurrence. To clarify on hours, 50 hours a week is basically the minimum, with average hours being around 60 and many people up past 70... this is excluding travel time too. Horrible projects could mean you're up till 2am most weekdays, then up at 7am the next morning. While weekend work is typically not the norm, you are pretty much expected to be available on any weekend if required, or answer basic emails, which can be a pain. Great people, except you barely get to know them - your home office may be full of people you like, but you only see them 1 day a week. Similarly, if you move to another project every few months you don't see your old teammates anymore. Great to meet people, but not great to know people. Demanding travel schedule - Virtually every project won't be local and you'll be flying out every Monday morning and coming back every Thursday night. If you're in New York or Chicago maybe you could get 1 in 3 or 4 projects local but they may not be the most thrilling assignments. Geography is not considered enough when staffing, so sometimes you will have people in the same role flying back and forth inbetween two cities, whereas both could be local if they traded projects.

Viewing 2200 - 2202 of 2,216 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,967 Kearney reviews submitted anonymously by Kearney employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Kearney is right for you.