Lam Research reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(2,414 total reviews)
avatar

Tim Archer

94% approve of CEO

86% positive business outlook

Lam Research has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,414 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Lam Research employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Produktion industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Jul 5, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

See cons. Toxic and unlawful enviornment.

Cons

would not recommend any process engineering roles at this organization. The haphazard attitude of management in the 3D-NAND deposition group is only compensated for by their dishonesty and lack of accountability. This has led to half of the group leaving; including people at the director level. Furthermore, there is a severe lack of safety: in late-January Lam sent a group of engineers to China during the viral outbreak. Management claims they were not aware of this outbreak when they sent people, but all of the Chinese-based Lam employees knew about it. Bringing up this fact to management and HR gets no response. Additionally, on the same day the US cancelled all flights to China due to the coronavirus, one of the US-based employees, who returned two days earlier from China, was told they should have stayed. This employee was also not informed to quarantine despite asking management earlier, because, at the time of the outbreak, Lam was not aware this employee went China. How can Lam not account for the very employees they ask to travel? Again, management and HR have no answer.

1.0
May 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fairly easy job, coworkers are nice, benefits and pay are decent enough but could be better frankly.

Cons

Beware the retention bonus, highly recommend negotiating for higher pay in lieu of the bonus, because I am leaving the company for a better job after leas than a year they want me to pay back 2000$ which isn't right, considering how much money I've saved them; they are a multi billion dollar company and they are penny pinching their employees to save profits. They will lay off people even if they worked there for 20 years, nobody is safe, then they will bring in more temps a few months later to replace them, and then those temps will inevitably be laid off too. The company really lacks a culture of valuing their employees and the skills they bring to the table, so anyone could be on the chopping block at any point in time. I guess if you're looking to get laid off just so you can collect unemployment, this would be a short career for you.

1.0
May 11, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Please read my cons section about going to China during the COVID outbreak and being told to stay and also being lied to.

Cons

At the onset of China's COVID-19 outbreak, in mid-January 2020, I was given 24 hours notice to travel there for a customer escalation. US news had not yet reported the virus. I was not made aware of a viral outbreak until I arrived in China as all of the Chinese-based Lam employees knew about it. While there, I was not told any preventative measures and not supplied any safety equipment except given a face mask, when I requested one, for my travel back to America. After fulfilling my obligation to my manager to stay a week in China -- as well as for safety reasons -- management told me I should still be in China regardless of the outbreak. This was despite management's promise to handle the escalation in China after I left. Management, however, decided to spin the story to our VP that I'd stay longer and that me leaving was a sign that I'm not committed to the customer or the business; this is also despite a group of Lam employees returning from China a week before me and were required to quarantine. It gets worse. I was told not to quarantine despite asking and, a week after my return, two close coworkers displayed COVID-like symptoms and both were out for over a week. HR is ineffective in these matters by stating management shouldn't have asked me to stay in China yet the managers responsible for this harmful decision still manage people. HR has further stated no one could have known the severity of this virus citing "a 2015 Ebola scare that didn't amount to much" yet neglect -- and refuse to discuss -- previous outbreaks such as SARS and H1N1. Additionally, HR said that my co-workers potentially catching the virus is pure speculation since there was no official COVID test. These events happened in early Feb 2020 before we had any COVID tests or started our lockdown. This seems outright negligent and irresponsible! Important lessons can be learned that seem to be ignored. The 3D-NAND deposition group, where this transpired, is a dysfunctional organization where you will encounter blaming, bullying, gaslighting, patronizing, hubris, ignoring boundaries, lying, and, worst of all, narcissism. This poor behavior has led to half of the group leaving; including people at the director level. If you take a job in this organization, consider this a warning: expect the aforementioned problems and the expectation to be a yes-man willing to sacrifice your health, safety, and any time with family in order to meet this organization's grotesque business objectives.

Viewing 124 - 126 of 2,414 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,807 Lam Research reviews submitted anonymously by Lam Research employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lam Research is right for you.