employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(14,512 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

82% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Lockheed Martin has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,512 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Lockheed Martin employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

15K reviews
1.0
Oct 29, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are able to find a good group within the company, junior engineers can get tons of diverse experience and responsibility. If you want a job that can help you build a resume for your next job, LM is perfect. Probably the best part of working for Lockheed is that there are thousands of groups within the company and you are reasonably free to move around until you find one that you like.

Cons

When you start at Lockheed, you'll hear people joke that we're the company that Dilbert is based on. After a year or two, you'll find out that those people weren't joking. While Lockheed can shower responsibilities and experience on young employees, all promotions are based on years of experience and all raises are based on sucking up to management. This is the sort of company where you could single-handedly win a $25 million contract and be turned down for a promotion because you are 1 month of experience short of the requirement. By the way, that's not hypothetical. In my time at Lockheed, I've seen situations just like that play out... twice! Lockheed is a silo'd company, so it really feels like a loose alliance of hundreds of small-medium companies. It's sort of an interesting place to work, until you realize that all parts of Lockheed fiercely compete with each other. We operate like a pack of wild animals, constantly fighting each other for food, but remaining together for survival. This creates a toxic, ultra-competitive environment where people are rewarded for betraying the guy down the hall because he's from a different part of the company. I've seen people get their yearly raise reduced for helping other parts of the company win new business. The last important thing to know is that they've been making small benefit and quality-of-life cuts every few months for the last ~3 years. They're usually small, but they keep happening like clockwork and they're adding up. I've had multiple raises and a promotion and my total compensation is the same as when I started. In essence, good performance is rewarded with just enough of a raise to keep your salary from shrinking.

1.0
Sep 3, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most fellows are truly talented and amazing individuals at LM. I get a steady paycheck. Flexible work hours if you have the right managers.

Cons

Poor talent management: Salary grade 4-6 people sleeping in their cubes all day. Poor talent management: People all around me fail to execute and it just continues. Poor talent management: Talented people salary grade 1-3 are constantly leaving the company. Poor talent management: Extreme salary compression. Unethical practices: Managers discouraging innovation and solutions so that LM can charge the government more billable hours, which results in a higher profit for the company. Unethical practices: Inconsistent labor charging practices. Unethical practices: Ethics reporting ignored. Poor culture: Career path is most influenced by who you know. Second most influenced by number of years at the company. And least influenced by work performance. Poor culture: Putting out fires is rewarded. Preventing fires is unrewarded and sometimes punished (see first unethical practices point). The highest performing young talent all seem to have one foot out the door. As soon as the economy gets better, I predict a mass exodus.

2.0
Dec 5, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Three weeks of vacation plus week of floating holidays (four weeks vacation bottom line) 2. Flex time

Cons

Concerning the benefits, unless you are on the inside, you are not treated too well. Taking vacation requires you to get advanced approval such as requesting time off at least a month ahead. Approval to take the time off is not granted until a week before at most. Forget getting inexpensive plane tickets. Also when going on vacation, you are required to leave contact information and where you will be. There is an unwirtten rule that you are expected to make up the time when you take off for vacation and also do some weekend work without compensation. Also for next year, a day was taken for floating holidays. We use to get 6 floaters but only 5 next year and no holiday for New Year's Day either ! Management mentioned that we need to conform to industry standard. You are also required to put in at least 45 hours per week before you are even considered for good performance reviews. People don't take Friday afternoons off as much as they use to. Prior to two years ago, it was common to walk around the office after 11:30am to see the place as a ghost town and parking lot empty but not anymore. Most people now work Friday afternoons and the parking lot is pretty full even at 3pm ! Things really started to go downhill when LMIT and IS&S combined into IS&GS and Linda Gooden took over as EVP. On dress code, they sent a memo out cracking down on it and then eventually a surprised visit by her where people were sent home for wearing blue jeans ! Word got out that jeans were not even allowed on Friday but luckily local management ignored it !

Viewing 184 - 186 of 14,512 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,647 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.