Lockheed Martin Software Developer reviews

I worked in a locked-down environment. Tools and software could only be updated with outside approval. I wasn't able to talk about the subject matter of my work to anyone but my team. Once a year, linked to compensation, Lockheed Martin does stack-ranked reviews with a 1 to 5 scale. 1 means you vandalized your workplace, 5 means you saved starving children from the Joker, and 2 means your manager has already talked to you about your borderline performance or behavior problem. For rating good workers, that leaves 3, nothing to shout about, and 4, well done. Your self-assessment, peer assessments, and manager assessments get compressed to one bit, which is fighting with twenty other bits for attention. My workplace expected a lot of me, including mandatory overtime for one stretch. We were assured that our efforts were helping us meet schedule, then our schedule slipped by several months. I felt there was a large disconnect between my sacrifices of time and management's reward or feedback for that time. I also felt that it served no purpose. In a larger way, I felt like management let our customers push for unrealistic schedules. This put pressure on software engineering to no great purpose. It can be very corporate at times, and the BS can be a little thick at times.

You will see firsthand how much waste, inefficiency, and fanboy jingoism exists in the defense industry In the non-defense sector Lockheed would be eaten for lunch. Too bloated, too full of itself.