employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin System Engineer Senior Staff reviews

4.4

99% would recommend to a friend

(52 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

100% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

System Engineer Senior Staff employees have rated Lockheed Martin with 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 52 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most System Engineer Senior Staff professionals have an excellent working experience there. Lockheed Martin is rated 21% above average by System Engineer Senior Staff professionals compared to other employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

52 reviews
3.0
Apr 1, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pension if you're grandfathered in. Good employee discounts program. Large company that's good at playing the Washington political game, so it has weathered the economic down-turn pretty well.

Cons

Non-existent training budget. Healthcare too expensive. 401k match only 4%, and fund choices aren't that great. Too large to really get noticed. Poor management connection with the average worker. Employee performance rating system is poor.

1.0
Oct 23, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Convenient location which resulted in a reasonable commute to work.

Cons

- The majority of the Lab Equipment in the Electrical Engineering lab was purchased in the 1970’s. In addition, there is no lab technician or lab manager to organize the lab and maintain the equipment due to budgetary reasons. - Engineers are not given the authority to make decisions or address road blocks. However, Engineers are held responsible for the assigned task by management. - Questionable practices in regard to charging of labor hours to government contracts. - Management refuses to write trip reports or inform the engineers of changes that affect requirements, schedules, or budgets. Engineers must call the customer to determine what changes management has agreed too. In regard to this problem one co-worker pointed out the fact that if a manager does not write it down the manager cannot be held responsible. - The small training budget is generally allocated to the recent college graduates. Long time employees in management positions will admit to never having completed a management training class. In addition, there is no budget or training program for mid level or senior level engineers. - The work is mainly low technology. Challenging high tech work is subcontracted out. - Insubordination issues by employees are not addressed by management in a timely manner. - Unknowingly, two different groups of people will be assigned the same task by the same manager thus duplicating effort. The result is overcharging the customer and over running the project budget. - Management ranks the employees. Rankings are generally dependent on management’s perception or familiarity with the employee as a result the employees at the bottom of the rankings are not necessarily the low performers. Low ranking employees are Involuntary terminated in staff reductions. - Personal vehicles are routinely vandalized in the parking lot. - Medical coverage is reduced by 10% on a yearly basis.

3.0
Aug 5, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are solid and there is some flexibility in the working environment

Cons

Schedules start 2-3 months behind, so you are always on OT

Viewing 43 - 45 of 52 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,717 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.