Medtronic reviews

3.7

67% would recommend to a friend

(9,928 total reviews)
avatar

Geoff Martha

54% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Medtronic has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 9,928 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Medtronic employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Produktion industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
4.0
May 18, 2022

Uncertain times ahead

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people at Medtronic are second to none. Everyone is very passionate about the Mission and the patients they serve.

Cons

Zero work/life balance. Certain roles are very understaffed. It's nearly impossible to take a vacation. New org. structure has complicated a lot of functions. Many really talented people, including senior leaders, are leaving to go to start-ups or competitors because they don't feel the pace is conducive to a life outside of work.

3.0
Sep 12, 2018

Senior Director

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CEO Omar Ishrak is the absolutely best CEO in Medtronic history. He has been laser focused on 3 key long term strategies, since he joined the company. This focus has facilitated the execution of the business strategies across all of the businesses. And the company has met its financial objectives in nearly all of the quarters since he became the CEO. The stock price is significantly higher than when he became CEO - that is a huge benefit to employees who participate in the stock purchase plan and who receive stock options and restricted stock units. And, obviously it is a huge plus for external shareholders. Employees in all businesses and geographies are committed to the Medtronic Mission. It is the glue that binds all business units and geographies. The very rapid pace of change helps employees grow their careers very quickly. They learn to adapt their skills and competencies to the ever changing business environment.

Cons

Work/Life balance in the U.S. is simply terrible, especially in staff functions. Many employees and leaders in staff functions are just burned out. After the Covidien acquisition, Medtronic became much more bureaucratic, and it adopted many of the Covidien bureaucratic policies and procedures. This resulted in many employees at the senior manager and director levels having to slow down the work of their teams to comply with the new rules. In the U.S., Medtronic employees also experienced a significant reduction in their benefits, as Medtronic responded to the need to reduce benefit costs to make sure that Covidien benefits did not increase too much. Also, after the Covidien acquisition, the business travel policy for airline travel significantly reduced the value of airline travel for business travelers. Medtronic said that its new policy was "competitive with market practices" (which it was NOT). But the aim of the changes was simply to reduce the cost of international airline travel at the expense of those business travelers who frequently traveled internationally.

2.0
Jan 31, 2024

Right Market. Wrong Company.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Only 10% of stroke patients are treated today so many opportunities in diagnosis, intervention (this business) and rehabilitation. Neurovascular is a special business where intervention provides life-saving / life-altering therapy. - Wide offering of non-compensation benefits, but short of competitive. - 20+ diversified businesses at Medtronic - strategic growth call outs are cardiac ablation, diabetes and structural heart - Neurovascular has been removed - Corporate directive to elevate more women into leadership positions

Cons

- Department of Justice investigated two charges with this business and Medtronic agreed to a settlement in 2018. Charges stemmed from practices dating back to 2008 and 2015. - Medtronic R&D spend doubled from 2014-2023, however, significantly behind peer group as a % of revenue. Innovation has suffered immensely. Market and shareholder appreciation will need to wait a decade to see any meaningful change especially in such a bureaucratic and matrixed organization. Stroke market expects rapid fire innovation forcing Medtronic to acquisitions, but there is one problem - corporate Medtronic isn’t growing revenue any faster than 4% and can’t get meaningful operating leverage to deliver more profits to generate cash. Cash prioritized to strategic growth businesses which Neurovascular is not. - Medtronic has immense pressure to deliver improved operating profit. Higher expectations put on Neurovascular to offset poor performing other businesses. Expectations are outsized with market growth, innovation and realistic market position. - 2/3 of revenue with the Neurovascular business comes from two products. One market leading product with the balance of portfolio in lagging market positions. Consistent pipeline challenges. - High teen percent employee turnover hasn’t materially improved causing several issues. Leadership and succession planning internally driving assignments with inexperienced and ill-prepared. Higher leadership appointments often coming from outside Medtronic. Employee development lacking. Engineering and marketing in Neurovascular have volatile staffing challenges reportedly perpetuated by poor or no leadership. - 20+ year Medtronic veteran, new leader arrived in Neurovascular early 2021 proclaiming change only to perpetuate a culture of fear - now with a smile. Operates with restricted and privileged access where seemingly routine updates are expected to be “performances”. Senior finance personnel describe not being able to communicate financial expectations in a straightforward manner and so forecasting is gaming. - Several examples of Neurovascular leadership positions open for nearly a year only to be filled by close personal friends of the president. Peculiar hiring practices like a manager appointment with no prior experience who assistant coached on the President’s youth football team. - Several quality issues in this business were served with regulatory warnings - symptoms of low to no process, poor training and revolving door for employees - High employee turnover combined with decade-long low investment in process and information technology is cause for extremely low employee job satisfaction (reported semi-annually) with ease of job and then with regards to managers caring about employees. - Year to year merit increase is budgeted at 2%. Leadership advertises promotions to be 4-8%. Major restructuring in recent years with annual layoffs to reduce levels offer fewer promotions causing career compression. Compensation is not competitive compared to larger Medtronic peer group and certainly not against other companies in Neurovascular - Enterprise-wide cost cutting measures in place for four-plus years with frozen headcount and minimal to no travel starting Q2 and lasting through end of year. Leadership seems to have no interest in customer and market. Focused on internal reporting and quarterly pressures.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 9,928 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,865 Medtronic reviews submitted anonymously by Medtronic employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Medtronic is right for you.