Nokia reviews

- People with actual skill building and developing ideas are often used as the workhorses for people who are good at developing "paper architectures" and ideas. - TC is not competitive, and career growth is slow/non-existent due to saturation at the top. - Constant turnover in leadership, which has led to constant re-organization and layoffs. - Constant internal messaging about how the company is changing moral X or core value Y, which cheapens what the leadership is trying to convey. - Ideas in research and development often never get validated by possible customers in target markets to find product market fit.

1. company pays you just enough so that you usually will not do all the tiring work of finding a new job. 2. when you are in development in a considerably big team you will usually not get important feature to develop on your application. It's quite hard to be like in the forefront of a feature development if you are a junior. 3. you have to be very lucky to be in a team where not too many senior tech leads/architects are there so that you actually get exposure to develop and design a feature from the forefront and someone is just mentoring you. 4. the problem in the R&D teams are technical architects, they don't move and go to a new team so that the juniors can get the chance of showing their capabilities. As i said one has to be very lucky to get better opportunities in the team