It was a presentation which I was given during the interview and then only 20 mins to prepare explain and justify my decisions whilst expected to research some sites they have provided as well as my own. Just was not enough time to soak it all in and process it. It's not a true reflection of the job or role as usually when presenting cases at court you have an idea of what the case is even if a new curve ball is thrown. This was a different scenario. I understand they want to see how quickly can you understand and present something but 20 mins on a big question is not enough time.
It was good very nice. I didn’t get the job but will apply again.
I would benefit from more prep in what to expect. But all in all it was good and I wish I got the job
I applied online. The process took 2+ months. I interviewed at Home Office (Wembley, England) in Mar 2023
Interview
Applied online, statement of suitability 700 words.. explain why your experience and stengths is suitable to the role using the job description. Interview was very nerve-racking.. the panel was very nice and knew how nervous we would be. Explained how the process would go at the start of the interview then sent me a word document with all the information to present, had 25mins to prep for presentation and 8 mins to present. I spoke for 6mins then they asked about 5 strength based questions. Then at the end i asked them questions and the interview was over. Overall was not as bad as i thought it would be. Waiting to see if i passed the interview or not.
Interview questions [3]
Question 1
How would you help two competing views arrive to a satisfactory decision?
