I applied through an employee referral. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Indeed in Feb 2019
Interview
Email first, then arranged a remote interview via skype. Interviewer was in a European office, using a tv as a screen and was far away from it so i could not see her properly
I applied online. I interviewed at Indeed (Dublin, Dublin) in Oct 2020
Interview
First Interview:
I had a Phone Screening interview, was basic and general. After two weeks I was told that I made it to the next stage of the interview process with Indeed.
Second Interview :
The second interview was via zoom. The interviewer was very friendly and professional, I enjoyed the interview. After three days I was told I passed to the third interview.
Third interview:
It was via zoom. The interviewer was very qualified in her career. I had negative vibes from the interviewer. I felt like she was angry, bored, or maybe tired. I really didn't feel comfortable like my previous interviews and I knew she didn't like me.
I was rejected, which is fine but waited nearly 2 weeks to know that. The whole interview process took one month and a week. Basically, most of the interviews nowadays are depending on the interviewer. In that case, it matter of luck more than knowledge and experience.
All the best for anyone applying :)
Thank you for leaving us a review about your experience. We've noted your feedback and passed this along to the team to review and act on accordingly. We apologise sincerely that you felt your experience was negative in this instance and appreciate your honest feedback.
I applied online. I interviewed at Indeed (Austin, TX) in Mar 2020
Interview
The first level technical interview was easy. A couple of standard algorithm question and one simple question on classification. Second round, was an interview with a product manager. Loads of questions on how to improve the experience for candidates and employees. It was going well until one of my answers. To make experience better for employers I had suggested that we should give a number that specifies how related the resume is to the job description and also order the resume based on this number, so that it is easier for employers to find matching candidates soon. The interviewer felt that it would be unfair to some candidates as they may be ranked at the bottom. This may be the reason for not going to the next round as well. I dont see why it is unfair as indeed should be ranking job description as I see most relevant to me on top. so given that it is not unfair to other companies that come in the bottom, why is it different for candidates? Also it is not like the companies cant see all the resume, since ATS filter non relevant candidates this is much better than ATS that doesnt even give a chance to recruiter to see them.