Wolt interview questions

The process was transparent and respectful, both, of me and my time. The process seems to be overall quite lengthy (I barely made it half way through - one 30-minute HR interview plus one 1.5-hour semi-technical interview and there would have been quite a bit more to come: assignment plus another two interviews as far as I understood) but it convinced me it is done so to ensure high standards. It was overall one of the most positive recruitment experiences I have had so far (excluding the end result :)). The HR employee specializes in recruitments for data science/machine learning/data engineering positions and seemed to understand very well the tech stack. Technical recruiter was a knowledgable, very friendly and likeable person that seemed to know what they want as well as genuinely care about what I wanted from them. I'd say that, overall, they seem like they know what they are doing.

They sent a message to me on LinkedIn, we had one interview with HR and after that with Team Leads. Then they sent me a coding assignment. The code assignment was quite algorithmic with a lot of corner cases that only some of them were mentioned. I did the task and sent it in one week. They rejected the task with a feedback of we couldn't even run it because it was lacking the X file and readme and stuffs but I sent them an screenshot explaining this is not true and they are included there. Also the technical reviewer was lacking Springboot understanding unfortunately and it seemed the one is having some Android background (guessing based on the comments) and they were not even valid =)) So i got really pissed off that I wasted my time for such team that doesn't care enough I spent couple of nights after work and my whole weekend but still they were nagging that this doesn't have the specs we want, because they were expecting a production quality code which were going to take a lot longer time. The other surprising problem was that the code reviewer didn't have a clear understanding from the PDF they sent me for the assignment, as there was some comments in their rejection feedbacks that was clearly indicating the reviewer didn't know his complain was written in the assignment. very disappointing.