Capital One reviews

Be the first to review this company

(13,154 total reviews)
avatar

Richard D. Fairbank

Not enough data to show CEO approval

Reviews by job title

13K reviews
1.0
Apr 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. Truly, some of the kindest, smartest, and most supportive coworkers I’ve had the chance to work with. We bonded deeply—but mostly through shared trauma. The solidarity among associates is the only reason many of us stuck around as long as we did. Benefits are great too, better than average actually.

Cons

Where to begin? This company is a textbook case of a toxic work environment dressed up as a “fun” place to work. The trauma bonding isn’t a joke, it’s survival. - Leadership is cliquey, insecure, and overwhelmingly made up of people who’ve never worked anywhere else. They operate like they own the place, reject any form of dissent, and are quick to punish those who dare to challenge the status quo with a PIP. - Original thinking isn’t rewarded, it’s shut down. Most associates learn quickly that the only way to avoid being put on a PIP (a one-way ticket out of the company) is to say yes to everything and stay quiet. - The performance management system is one of the worst I’ve seen. Twice a year, a fixed percentage of employees—usually around 15%—are put on coaching plans or PIPs, regardless of actual performance (forced distribution). These aren’t developmental plans, a PIP is a countdown to your termination. - Promotions and growth opportunities are promised but never delivered. Especially in Canada, there’s no real intention to grow the business, and no interest in developing talent. - The constant churn caused by the PIP system has created a revolving door of young, fresh-out-of-school employees who don’t yet know better. They’re easier to mold into saying yes to everything and are kept happy with superficial perks like tone deaf social events and pizza parties. It’s all performative.

1.0
Jan 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

401k match and ESPP are solid

Cons

The culture has gotten continually worse since the Mid-Year cycle of 2023. I have watched talented peers get blindsided with PIPs to push them out of the company. People Leaders don't really care for your perspective and want you just to execute their idea without question. People work more out of fear they won't have enough to highlight during Performance Management twice a year rather than getting to enjoy doing rewarding work.

2.0
Jan 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- If you're a new grad and join the ADP program, the company will prioritize giving you interesting work as an investment in your potential as a future executive. This is a good place to be for a year or two -- maybe more, but only if you get fast-tracked. You will know if you are fast-tracked. - There are interesting opportunities on specific teams.

Cons

- OKR culture has pervaded the entire organization. This is basically just an excuse for management to obsess over their bonus incentives constantly. They spend weeks every quarter re-negotiating OKRs instead of accomplishing anything useful. It used to be the case that people at least pretended to care about the business and thinking like the CEO. Instead, this time around, my manager told me "that's not in our OKRs" when I suggested a project that would directly improve the company's profitability. Since another team owned those OKRs he didn't care. - Middle management is mostly people from failed consulting careers, Amazon, or other generally-middling backgrounds that do not lend themselves to much opportunity. They typically have no subject matter expertise in banking. Before I joined management blew up their P&L leaning into a product that was clearly experiencing temporary tailwinds from the events of 2020.   - As a boomerang hire, I felt a pit of despair immediately upon entering the office. Everyone there looks unhappy and is fighting for the survival of their careers. I saw a woman cry once at her desk in the middle of the workday, then get back to work. Our executive accidentally revealed the percentage breakdowns of specific questions in the quarterly associate survey, revealing that 40% of people were either burnt out or concerned about being burnt out, and 1/3 were considering leaving within the next 12 months. Management's solution was to adopt a "green/yellow/red light" strategy in 1 on 1 check-ins. That's how out of touch they are. - Stack ranking alone is sufficient reason to avoid this company. It is like dousing the flame of horrible, toxic culture with lighter fluid. If you are a professional hire new to an org, you must start scrambling immediately to make alliances. "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" is the name of the game. This also occupies several weeks of management's time twice a year. - When I originally joined Capital One one of the core company principles was "unassailability" -- doing the right thing. I worked on several projects that actually had this as a primary mission and made the world a better, less-scammy place. They literally got rid of this principle. In contrast, in my most recent role there were executive debates about refunding customers with whom we had clearly made an error. Just to save a few dollars. At the expense of risking Capital One's global brand. - An example of how strong the Kool-Aid is here: employees are grateful for the opportunity to buy cafeteria food at "subsidized" rates. Mind you, the campus is in the middle of nowhere. - Professional hires mainly exist to backfill horrible roles that no one internally wants. This was the case with my role. The former employees' name was mentioned just once or twice, almost as if he never existed. - Extremely top-heavy management structure. 10 people barking orders for every person actually doing work. This is a major reason why management is so out of touch. None of them are ever actually working -- just having meetings and posturing for OKR re-negotiations -- so they don't understand how long it takes to do most things. - Directors used to have to actually understand what was going on. Now, they've brought in a Project Manager role as a buffer between directors and the lower ranks. The entire point of this role is to host meetings all day and it's depressing just to interact with them. - Middle-upper management constantly refers to themselves as "leadership" / "your leaders" without even realizing how cringe this is.

Viewing 139 - 141 of 13,154 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21,266 Capital One reviews submitted anonymously by Capital One employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Capital One is right for you.