Cisco reviews

4.1

82% would recommend to a friend

(33,605 total reviews)
avatar

Chuck Robbins

78% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

Cisco has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 33,605 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Cisco employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

34K reviews
2.0
May 13, 2021

More focused on causes than business excellence

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay, great benefits, lots of opportunities for career progression. Very collaborative environment. People are really kind, caring, and invested in one another's success.

Cons

The company is so focused on social causes that they are losing perspective on their products and overall excellence in work. There are more meetings held to showcase a specific political perspective than there are to discuss how the business is doing and how it can continue to improve and succeed. People don't have the skills/capabilities they need to actually lead in their area, to innovate, or to problem solve.

1.0
Jul 15, 2020

Not so good experience!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good Technical Work. - Workspace facilities - Cafeteria food - Opportunity to work with talented engineers

Cons

At SP Routing BU in India, engineers work at least 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. There are no weekends or holidays, and you would even be indirectly asked to work on the days when you file a leave. There is no respect given for engineers, and work life balance is completely unheard of. In the days when we talk about abolishing keywords like "Slave" even from techical jargon, the engineers in SP India are treated as if they are "owned" by Cisco, and expected to be available 24x7. The entire hierarchy of senior management consists of egoistic and narcissist lot who treat engineers like some sort of tools to be used and disposed off. They dont like any engineer saying he/she is overloaded with work - that's something they hate to hear. So, engineers are expected to not complain, and just continue working on their stretch targets during their entire life, sacrificing their personal lives and health, so that the Management can claim to get more work done by less people. If anyone complains, they would be pushed back saying that we are not working "optimally", or we should think of "automation" instead of doing "donkey's work" etc. etc - That would certainly be not motivating at all, after working on complex technical problems. The management seems to be totally clueless when it comes to understanding the value of technical contributions of engineers, and they just go after some jargons and fancy terminologies and matrics. The main responsiblity of the Management is to use the whip and constantly apply pressure on employees to squeeze the maximum out of them, which is a strtegy that is systemically pushed down from top to bottom in the hierarchy of management. They would often be hypocritical and "encourage" the employees to give "open comments", but all they are expecting is that engineers should just "align" themselves with the general labor strategy and directions from top. Project schedules are dervided based on a sort of "bargaining process" between the engineers and management, resembling some sort of civil construction work. The engineers go with a particular effort estimate which will be outright rejected by the Management, who would want "justifications" for every single day projected. The implicit bargaining process results in engineers cutting down the effort projections by half, agreeing to "absorb" the work. Eventually, the project tends to slip, and engineers work 24x7 to meet the targets, only to get constantly criticized and tortured with sarcastic comments regarding the delays and slippage. Even though the quality of technical work done in the BU is superiod, there is never a sense of achievement, and it appears like the management constantly wants to make every engineer feel that they are failures.

avatar
Cisco Response
5y
We are sorry to hear about your personal experience, and appreciate you taking the time to inform us. We have since raised these concerns with our Engineering Talent Acquisition Team, who were responsive and surprised. Cisco's focus on culture means we understand that we will always have room for improvement. As an employee, I'm sorry this happened to you, but can also validate that, while it may be scary, we welcome you to safely and confidentially bring your concerns to your leader, HR, or email ethics@cisco.com so we can help address them. Those outside Cisco can learn more and share concerns at https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/corporate-social-responsibility/ethics-office/about.html
1.0
Jun 23, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great and smart coworkers. Located in the bay area.

Cons

Bias, one-sided, and egotistical micro managers. Low pay compared to local rates. Too many late night meetings. Business not doing well. Lots of lay-offs

Viewing 265 - 267 of 33,605 Reviews

Glassdoor has 39,356 Cisco reviews submitted anonymously by Cisco employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cisco is right for you.