Great company, unless you have a disability - Anonymous employee LinkedIn Employee Review

2.0
Mar 21, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

LinkedIn has a lot of focus on the employee experience, meaning there's heavy emphasis on culture and values. Because they really try and enforce their 'no ahole' policy, you work with a truly great group of people

Cons

There are no employees with a visible disability working in any of the LinkedIn EMEA offices (or San Francisco, Toronto, Chicago, New York, Sao Paolo for that matter). When I tried to give feedback and get the employee resource group to be more active, I was told by HR "disabilities are not a priority for LinkedIn" and I was qualified as 'difficult'. Every time I now see Pat Wadors give a speech on the importance of 'Diversity, inclusion and belonging', I crinch, because what she means is Belonging for those groups that are a priority. I was one of LinkedIn's biggest advocates and loved working there. I left incredibly disappointed!

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
May 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Love it, high paced environment

Cons

no cons! love the people and culture

3.0
Feb 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Cons

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All