The worst place I've ever worked - Manager LinkedIn Employee Review

1.0
Oct 6, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Superficially good culture Some really great coworkers Microsoft equity Free food/snacks

Cons

It's an old boys club. Promotions are handed out based on where you want to grad school or how you know decision makers from outside of work. If you're not in the old boys club, then strong performance does not get rewarded. Getting an 'exceeds expectations' performance review has no bearing on your promotion timeline - because if you're not in the old boys club then you're not getting promoted no matter how strong your case for promotion is - even when the promotion has been promised. Conversely, if you are in the old boys club (which is limited to white men), promotions land in your lap after a few months on the job even though the entire org is convinced that you're undeserving. Ultimately, senior leaders are only to serve themselves. They'll grab territory to make themselves seem important. And throw a few crumbs on junior staff (e.g. free snacks, half-yearly happy hours) to make them happy. Culture is superficially nice. But scratch beneath the surface and it's the same rotten culture as any other non-tech org. It's a frat house masquerading as a tech firm. Avoid at all costs.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great company! highly recommend working there

Cons

there are no cons that

3.0
Feb 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Cons

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All