Jaggaer reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(467 total reviews)

Andrew Roszko

91% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Jaggaer has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 467 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Jaggaer employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

467 reviews
2.0
Dec 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The product suite was actually quite good and very few competitors are able to deliver as broad of an offering. The sales team that was assembled when I was there was top notch, but that didn't last very long. As a sales exec, I enjoyed the freedom offered to structure deals in multiple ways. The professional services team that did implementations was great but there were never enough of them.

Cons

Biggest issue was inability to deliver products and upgrades on time. Customers were left waiting years for promised functionality. The culture was very anti-sales in that corporate management was always looking for ways to not pay sales people on a transaction. CEO and CFO seemed to take great pleasure in humiliating sales teams during quarterly reviews and refused to take advice on what needed to be done to win more customers. Marketing was almost non-existent outside of the Higher Education market.

1.0
Nov 28, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some reviews that state that the employees are under-paid. While I cannot speak for us all, I found my compensation to be relatively fair. In my opinion, pay scales of oil companies or banks are generally expected to be higher than that of generic software companies. The benefits (while a slight step down from the previous plan before we were acquired by SciQuest) are still very good, and better than many other places that I have personal experience with. Free coffee and pop The people who are still here have great personalities and are talented at their job. Plenty to learn on the job if you are a Junior Developer

Cons

Its taken me a while to write this review, but a part of me truly felt like I needed to warn people who are considering joining this company in the Edmonton office. As a long time employee, I have seen various periods of turnover come and go. While this is to be expected with any company at the end of the day, this office truly is in a state of turmoil and depression. The amount of turnover we have experienced in Edmonton within this past year truly is staggering, and here is my look into some of the reasons why. I have worked with many, many talented, bright, experienced employees here, but unfortunately few of them are still there, as they were either pushed out of the door, or put in a position where they were bound to leave to go pursue other opportunities. Intermediate to senior-level resources generally feel undervalued and under-appreciated. These same employees are either severely under-utilized (where their roles are diminished to nothing but a title with no true role) or severely over-utilized (long term employees with the product and process knowledge essentially end up carrying a management dictated workload on their backs and have no choice to wear multiple hats). These overworked employees generally are not thanked for their “above and beyond” level of work. On top of this unfortunately is the sad realization that employees of this office generally have no career growth opportunities, as management within this office has been continually pushed out and replaced with resources that reside in the same city as the head office. There are many employees within this office that are beyond qualified, and have several years of experience to boot, but they are still sadly over-looked. The management that has been chosen is not all bad, but most have unfortunately not shown the ability, nor the willingness to learn the product we are responsible for, which makes their decisions very uninformed and confusing to the employees expected to carry out the direction that has been chosen for them. Like most companies, your career path and career path is promoted as something that they support (and looking at the newsletters, this seems to be the case in other offices), but in this office, it certainly is not something that is encouraged and supported. On countless times, employees have been blocked from switching positions and given no hope (often told if they are unhappy with their position, they should resign). While it is understandable that management has to ensure that they keep enough resources in each department, with the massive amount of turnover that this office has experienced, no effort has been made to replace these resources. We are continually told that management is trying their hardest to hire, but in the midst of a several month period (which is still continuing) where we experienced many significant losses in the development department, there are ZERO postings on this very site Glassdoor, on Monster, or any of the other various popular job sites as of the date of this writing. If it truly was a priority to replace these resources, Sciquest would be on one of these sites. Currently nobody out there knows you are hiring. Feedback has been given countless times to management by various senior level resources and other well respected employees (former management), but the feedback is generally discarded, and no adjustments are made. When it comes down to it, employees generally lose their motivation to get the job done, as they are essentially ordered to accomplish a goal that is completely unrealistic and unattainable with the lack of resources. Simply put, its hard to win, when you are continually set up to fail by your leaders. With this situation laid out, where employees with great potential can never accomplish goals, and are shown that there is nowhere for them to go, it is absolutely no surprise that they choose to go elsewhere so that they can accomplish what they have personally set out to do and have great careers. Management, while generally friendly, have undoubtedly failed to lead the employees of this office. While many proposals for improvement have been presented, no positive changes have been made that I can think of. While management is quick to call meetings at various times to talk about low company morale, action items taken away are never actually actioned upon. When these items are brought up at a later date, they are generally shoved aside and discarded leaving us to believe that the employees voice is simply just not being heard, or taken seriously. Decisions that are in fact made are done without any sensitivity or regard to the people who work there. Even some decisions that seem obvious to offend the employees are made on a constant basis, and do not seem very well thought-out. As mentioned earlier, it is extremely difficult to write this review, as there are still some very talented resources who still remain here. If you are a Junior resource looking to get in the door and gain some experience, there certainly is a lot of value and a lot to learn. It is just a shame that the company generally does not hire employees who have no experience. In my opinion, if you are someone with experience, there is absolutely nothing to gain from employment here unless you are comfortable in staying in the same role for the entire duration of your employment here. While difficult to write, I did my best to write this review as professionally as I possibly could so that it is not thrown in the pile of “the angry bitter ex-employee who wants to ruffle feathers on his/her way out”. While I have moved on from SciQuest, I still do communicate with people still employed here and it truly is a shame. I just wanted to give people considering SciQuest Canada a cold, hard, but completely honest look at how things are here. What once was a "fun" but productive office, now lacks any sort of positive culture or set of values. It feels like the leaders from Edmonton all the way up to the head office have given up on the employees. With this realization, it truly is no surprise that the people have also given up on this office and their leaders, and will continue to do so at a staggering rate until some serious changes are made.

1.0
Oct 16, 2014

Trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free coffee, free pop, good camaraderie within teams, some good people are still working there.

Cons

Management by decree. The management team over me changed, and they didn't want to hear about the previous regime. Those of us who had been through a rough time were not given any credit for hanging in. Some small improvements in morale came - and then came employee evaluation time. The management had been told that they were too generous in evaluating us - so there was evaluation deflation. Any small mistake was turned into an excuse to lower our raise and bonus. Attacking symptoms - the management went after any slip ups like they were intentional attempts to sabotage the company. When extra hours were put in debugging and solving problems, that was expected behaviour. But any attempt to change the processes so that the mistake *couldn't* happen again was treated as "adding risk". Minimal Unit Testing - due to the design of the product we were working with, unit testing was not feasible (lots of generated code) so the unit testing was done by the customers after release. Quality has been abysmal and management has not been able to drive quality by using "agile"/"scrum" while ignoring root causes of the quality issue. Morale / turnover: at this point, enough good people have left that the ones that remain are grimly holding on while in many cases updating their resumes. In a technical job evaluation, I was told that I was to be a member of an orchestra - following the conductor's lead. When I suggested the manager meant a jazz ensemble, where I would have some freedom to improvise within the structure of the requirements, the manager explicitly said no, that freedom had to be stamped out so that the manager could have predictability and lowered risk. My response to that is now: lowered risk of success, lowered risk of having engaged employees, lowered risk of innovation, certainty of abysmal performance. Have fun with that!

Viewing 91 - 93 of 467 Reviews

Glassdoor has 524 Jaggaer reviews submitted anonymously by Jaggaer employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Jaggaer is right for you.