employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin reviews about "manager"

73% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

807 reviews
3.0
Feb 18, 2016

Unpredictable Mgmt

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the departments are great - allowing flexible schedules, trusting employees, providing training so you can grow in your career across the company

Cons

Some departments are the exact opposite of described in pros, feeling like you have stepped back into the 1940s with gender and racial inclusion, "old boys network," having face-time be more important than work product, etc. It all depends on the specific manager. Senior Mgmt really wants a compsny as described in the pros, but they aren't willing to get rid of long-term managers who do not fit with that culture unless they do something blatantly illegal. Their culture change initiatives have no teeth and no true champion. Therefore, nothing will really get better until that group of managers all retire in 3-15yrs. Career growth can be amazing, but once again is more manager based than individual performer based. If your manager believes in development, you can get training, growth assignments and a career champion that you will not get if your manager sees training you as a threat. If everyone who leaves a department is willing to lateral out, & then they get promoted quickly if they are lucky enough to get to another department, senior management doesn't see this as a red flag

3.0
Feb 11, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours and close ties with customers

Cons

Recent IS&GS sale to Leidos was unexpected. Inability to move to other programs.

5.0
Feb 8, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule, no micromanagement, better than decent raises (if you are a performer), 3 weeks vacation per year, plus sick time, plus personal business time, on-site medical clinic, great work atmosphere, work culture is one of the best I've worked in, excellent personal space, on-site cafeteria, cafeteria hubs/branches through out the plant, reserved parking spot for 20 year employees/managers, pretty decent benefits (medical, dental, eye), straight pay for salary exempt over hours over 45, high paying salaries, job security/longevity,

Cons

Parking lots saturated with reserved parking for senior employees and managers and parking in one will have your vehicle towed, hours 40-45 are unpaid for salary exempt (these are free hours you give in which LM charges the government for, but supposedly this is what allows them to pay the higher than average salaries), wish the health insurance was a little better, but I hear its better than other company's health insurance. Some systems are outdated/antiquated but that's supposedly the cause of lack of funds or dying contracts.

3.0
Feb 2, 2016

Project Manager

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Company with flexibility to move around if you have a good manager

Cons

I transitioned to a position I could not escape from. The work was fabulous, but my manager was not. My biggest mistake my own fault for not paying for external training. I was stuck to a program for seven years and could only get project management or system engineering training, but I am a software engineer and couldn't get any training approved. I was laid off when we lost the contract to GD without any current skills since the my program was ~ 20 years behind the state of the art.

3.0
Feb 9, 2016

Experience depends on the client

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-I had a supportive, readily available program manager although hands were tied by client/contractor relationship - LM had internal resources for professional growth -benefits are decent; matching is great up to 8% (if i recall correctly) -LM is great if you're on the right contract. I did not have that fortune.

Cons

- Had a HORRIBLE client experience, she was a micromanager like I've never seen/heard of before, provided little to no support or interest in professional growth, stereotypical government mentality "do things like this because that's the way we've been doing it like this for 8 years", she lacked in subject matter expertise (which became apparent to her staff), etc. In turn, by this person being the client, there was little LM could do to change this. I wish my manager had been more transparent about the client's management style so they/I could have found a better fit. My colleagues are all highly educated (multiple graduate and terminal degrees), all with over 10 years experience, and our supervisor (client) managed us as though we were recent college graduates- hence, VERY low office morale. - I wish LM had more opportunities for staff who work on client-site interact with the corporate office- even if it meant after-hours networking, training sessions. I felt a real disconnect because I was on the client site 5 days a week-- and a client who made us move mountains if we wanted to attend a out-of-office training, workshop, etc- even when relevant to work. When it came time to looking for a new assignment, I was at a disadvantage. - They require you to enter your previous salary when completing the application. I don't know how you get around this required field. I was offered just a couple thousand above my previous salary-- which was a severe low-ball considering the GS equivalent of my position (which I later learned). Seriously low-balled. I needed the job at the time, so I was not in a position to push back. -The economy was at it's worst at the time, so I stayed longer than I should have. I knew in the first 7 months, this was a no-where position. Live and learn. (excuse any typos)

Viewing 175 - 177 of 807 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,716 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.