Lockheed Martin reviews about "training"

Training budgets are constrained Middle management believe in timelines for progression over ability which can hold top performers back

High turnover rate in areas which causes lack of experience in critical areas. Not necessarily a company problem but still creates problems none the less. Some training programs take a while to get spun up which leaves employees waiting for critical training.

only small percentage of people are appricated

Contract work can be difficult. You typically do a lot of flying (but with work from home) if you're not onsite. If you're an onsite analyst you may be asked to relocate and the locations aren't always ideal. Project managers should be more willing to dish out some additional training, especially when I know for a fact they're earning the company two to four times off of me what I earn in a single year.

New to the company on large contract; no training provided. Extremely difficult to meet contract performance metrics on large programs - company bid low and over-sold operationally in proposals. Employees were overworked and stressed out working in chaotic environments. Senior management expected employees to perform and metrics to be met, regardless; they didn't feel the pain of the employees on the ground. It's not surprising the division was sold.

No big complaints, other than the no brainer: make sure to take advantage of any career opportunities (training, position openings, etc), but also make sure to "play your hand close to the vest." Some managers get upset if you look outside of your current role or have an overall goal that does not involve your current position. Lockheed is a big company with plenty of opportunities and very successful employees, so I suggest getting a trusted mentor to help out.

Training is often neglected. Performance rating system is atrocious!