Procter & Gamble reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(14,324 total reviews)
avatar

Jon R. Moeller

83% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Procter & Gamble has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,324 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Procter & Gamble employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Produktion industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

14K reviews
5.0
Nov 14, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The quality of the people you interact with is top notch, the company does really look after the employee. Flexible work hours, easy going culture.

Cons

You need to market your achievements and skills and not always will the person with the best work/results be rewarded.

3.0
Jun 20, 2012

Great Company, a bit tarnished

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the most intelligent, caring employees around Great reputation, brands, and ethics

Cons

So big that employees can't see how they contribute to the bottom line and instead work on functional goals that aren't always aligned to the business.

3.0
Jun 9, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They do pay well for an hourly technician. The medical has gotten a bit worse since I've been here but is still better than a lot of what is available today. The profit sharing is nice, if less than what the people who started prior to 2005 receive.

Cons

A couple things here. First off and most importantly, the rotating shifts are horrible. There is no reason for them. Other than to keep employees from more easily advancing their education or seeking other employment opportunities. They justify it as having interaction with management. If that is important make managers rotate as well. They are not nearly as important to the day to day running of a manufacturing facility than the technicians are. As a matter of fact, there are probably at least 50% too many managers at this site. This leads to an even larger bureaucracy that makes the unneeded layers of said managers constantly trying to justify their jobs. We all realize we are just tools for managers to get their next promotion. Also, they try to sound incredibly earnest and attempt to convey that they are concerned with our safety while at the same time refusing to even have a a discussion involving rotating shifts and excessive over time. Just because we don't possess engineering degrees doesn't mean we are stupid. Please do not insult our intelligence, it is beneath both sides. Work/life balance is non-existent. There is also to much of a blanket over reaction to everything that happens here regardless of it being safety, quality or anything else. Instead of addressing the issue with those directly involved we have to pull the entire site/department or whatever into the situation to "ensure it never happens again". Here is the problem, you're dealing with equipment designed by human beings and other human beings operating it. There is not a possibility of never having an issue. If NASA has shuttles blow up what is the likelihood of us not having no one ever screw up putting a soap in a bottle? Pretty much not possible and it is arrogant presumption to expect otherwise. The real reason behind all of this is that it takes bonus money out of managers pockets and makes it harder for them to get their next promotion. End of story. There is a reason managers rotate to different sites or roles every 3 years or so. It is so they can step on whoever for whatever they need and not have to face those people in the long term. Again, please do not insult our intelligence by assuming we're too stupid to figure this out.

Viewing 463 - 465 of 14,324 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21,303 Procter & Gamble reviews submitted anonymously by Procter & Gamble employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Procter & Gamble is right for you.