Primary Clinical Pharmacist onsite at a DC Hospital
Pros
We are seen as a point of care within the hospital and have had success in specialty. We are viewed as a point of care and as a trusted partner of the hospital. We have developed a patient-centered care culture.
Cons
The company has always treated us like a step child. We are not valued equally when compared to the other onsite's located a bigger or better funded hospitals. Ironically , we have had more growth and success versus our sister store down the road. Why, is a bigger question that HR may have to deal with. Additionally, as a whole I believe the culture has changed. When I fist started with company, prior to pharmacy school, it felt like I was a apart of a family. This is definitely not the current situation. We are no longer valued and are viewed as dispensable. Personally, a little appreciation and gratitude for many who work so hard to deliver great patient care would go a long way. There are no more incentives for pharmacists. The bonuses have been depleted to the point of nonexistence. Even, annually raises are no more. So, if you do not work in Chicago where a union exists, say hello the new business model. AKA turnover, turnover, turnover in the district/DMV will continue. Yeah, there tons of RXM, RXMO, RMGO or other management positions available, but whats the point if the individual is not provided with the resources and tools to succeed. Finally, ever since the last Walgreens retired, we have seen a shift to a business model that does not look through the eyes os a pharmacist. Now, it seems as though the top priority is no longer the patient, but the bottom line. This does not align with my values. I strongly believe, if this direction continues, patient care and outcomes in the district will be negatively impacted.