Cisco reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(33,681 total reviews)
avatar

Chuck Robbins

78% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

Cisco has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 33,681 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Cisco employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

34K reviews
1.0
Oct 16, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Work Culture is ok. You have something called as work from home option so that you can work from any part of country 2. Great campus 3. Great food court in campus :) 4. Good facilities like online access to Safari, Wi-fi network in entrie campus ( you can work from food court also), gymnasium, tennis court, basketball court, cricket pitch, volleyball court

Cons

1. I am with Cisco from past 3 years. Believe me there has been not even a single Indian Rupee hike. People might be talented here, but their attitude towards others is very bad especially seniors. 2. Everyone pretends to be Champion across all platform and technologies, but most of them know nothing. Most of the people here in India are very rude. 3. Working from home is good option, but on the other hand its painful coz you are expected to work in US West Coast Timings and attend late night meetings 4. Too much work pressure for very little salary 5. Even though all the sports and gym facility is present, work pressure is so much that you never get time to visit any of these sport facility any time 6. When it comes to money, Cisco is really bad as they never give good hikes as compared to other companies.

2.0
Jul 6, 2010

Delicate Balance

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to a broad spectrum technologies and market segments. Abundance of training Consortium of brilliant technologists, visionaries, and distinguished engineers until their creativity is stifled, compromised, and eventually re-packaged.

Cons

The agenda of headquarters is not communicated effectively to the field and partner ecosystem or field tested for validity before it is put in production with the sunset of tools, processes, and programs. Any efficiencies and ROI's that may have been gained are lost with rework, work around processes and partner/customer damage control. The most amusing power struggles and political positioning of SVP, AVP, Directors, etc. There was a day at Cisco when John Chambers wanted no more than four levels of management down from CEO. There are more VPs than a bank and just as much distrust, self-absorption, and lack of true leaders. Programs are funded in multiple departments to develop and deploy the same end goal resulting in overlap and confusion. These initiatives have elaborate benchmarks, milestones, etc. in which the program teams must meet the red, yellow, or green milestone whether it has any business relevance or not. Still huge parity in the best, most qualified individual with equitable compensation and compliance with federal diversity metrics for tax considerations. Employee performance and goal attainment is very subjective. If you are not identified for advancement, your compensation and success is easily manipulated towards marginal or worse non-performance. Do not expect to be given credit for process improvement recommendations, lead generation, best practices, etc. as you are not socialized or given credit for it to executive management. You will often see 'golden ones' given accolades for your creativity. All internal moves are lateral even if the job has increased job responsibilities and advanced skill sets. Salaries are not competitive with industry and increases are based partially on epm ratings. The problem here is managers are given a certain number of X and E+ ratings for their reports. This is a position in which even the most well meaning manager is tested with doing the right thing.

3.0
May 27, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Cisco is still a good company, good starting salary and weekend shift loading, it gave equal opportunity for engineer to make the same amount regardless their grade. the bonus is ok, better than those promises-but-never-see company. Training and material is great, you will find lots of stuff to learn and grow you technical skills.

Cons

the rewarding scheme is poor, engineers are working long hours and extra miles to reach the MBO, but not getting rewarded. the pay raise is non-existent. very hard to get promotion.

Viewing 724 - 726 of 33,681 Reviews

Glassdoor has 39,453 Cisco reviews submitted anonymously by Cisco employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cisco is right for you.