employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Enterprise Mobility

Engaged Employer

Enterprise Mobility reviews

4.0

100% would recommend to a friend

(19,355 total reviews)
avatar

Chrissy Taylor

Not enough data to show CEO approval

100% positive business outlook

Enterprise Mobility has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 19,355 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Enterprise Mobility employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Transport & Logistik industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

19K reviews
3.0
Jun 3, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

27,000 is a good base salary for entering the job market as a graduate and provides you with a set of new skills and experience beneficial to you from their graduate programme. Provided you work hard at Enterprise the career progression can be rapid earning you a promotion to assistant branch manager in just 12 months.

Cons

Although the base pay is high the hours worked are much higher than your average working week. Contractually you work 45-50 hour week which is A LOT and that equates to £11.25-£12.50. £11.25 puts you below the national minimum wage so I am concerned with this initially however, if I do end up working 50 hours I will voice these concerns.

2.0
Apr 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the standout positives of working within Enterprise is the steep learning curve. The company indeed lives up to its reputation for being a fertile ground for young graduates looking to dip their toes into various aspects of business operations. As a trainee, the exposure to different facets of the business, from customer service to fleet management, is unparalleled. This environment fosters a rapid development pace, equipping employees with a broad skill set in a relatively short amount of time.

Cons

However, this accelerated learning comes at a cost. The work-life balance at Enterprise, particularly within the trainee program, is notably skewed towards work. The expectation to consistently perform at peak can feel daunting and, at times, unsustainable for someone fresh out of university. It's a sentiment echoed among peers, where the pressure to juggle workplace demands alongside personal development and wellness can feel like a tightrope walk without a net.

1.0
Apr 18, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hybrid work schedule; Flex scheduling; Team bonding; Independence; Easy work

Cons

The License & Title Department within Enterprise Fleet Management has proven, on multiple occasions, to be managed poorly, inefficiently, and with hostility. The below points, and more, were brought to the attention of management and HR multiple times. At each turn, they were dismissed and faced with a complete lack of accountability or responsibility. Instead, management will gaslight their employees into thinking they are the only one experiencing the issue, and turn the entire situation around so that the employee is just being difficult. When concerns of a hostile, toxic work environment were brought to the appropriate parties, the response was “Your words are grounds for investigation into the department. So you need to watch your words because they are unprofessional." They willfully admitted that there should be an investigation into the conditions in the department, and willfully admitted that they would neglect their responsibility to launch said investigation. There is a tremendous amount of gaslighting that occurs within the company. Concerns regarding the morale, treatment, and exhaustion of the employees was brought to the appropriate parties. Rather than attempting to resolve more than the most minor of issues, management uses the time to accuse employees of being a “negative influence in the department”. Employees are repeatedly told not to talk to their coworkers at all. There is also favoritism within the company. This causes a hostile, unsupportive work environment for those individuals who are not deemed favorable. Especially since the favoritism observed is not based on any ethical means. It is not based on work or skills, but on personal traits (e.g., if you are a mother, one person gives you special treatment as she, too, is a mother). However, despite not being merited, these favored employees are presented with opportunities similarly or more capable employees are not. Supervisors will lighten their favored employee’s workload so that they could focus on career advancement. When applying for the same promotions, other employees are not given the same grace. Instead, their workloads oftentimes are increased to pick up the slack of the favored. There is a great lack of consistency in the expectations and accountability within the company. It is stated that expectations are held at a department-level than a company-level. However, in this department, the expectations are not in fact held at a department-level. Nor are they even held at a manager- or supervisor-level. Instead, they are held on a person-by-person basis. It is clear that managers/supervisors have different expectations on responsibilities and accountability for certain individuals than they do for others. Furthermore, policies are also inconsistently upheld on a person-to-person basis. Some employees are given special treatment and not held accountable on matters including attendance and core hours, as example. Certain employees have not been held to the guidelines of working the 9:00-3:00 core hours, in office on appropriate days, while others have been fired under the same grounds. Between the gaslighting, favoritism, and inconsistencies, the department’s morale greatly suffers. This is an easily observable pattern. Hardworking employees are overloaded with assignments while less responsible employees are catered to. More often than not, it is the latter group that is put up for promotions and leadership opportunities. This practice, instead of creating a productive workforce, drives the reliable employees out of the company. There is a reason there is so much turnover in this job, and it is not because of promotions. More employees are willing to make lateral moves just to leave. This has created a shared impression among many in the department that management pushes out “difficult” employees—those who challenge the company to be better, and who work harder than others while maintaining department- and position-specific goals and expectations. Management pushes out these "difficult" employees. Some have quit out of frustration, while others have been fired (in many ways) unjustly to “shut them up". There is an obvious sentiment of “If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all” in this department. Management has made it very clear that they do not want to hear criticism of any kind. Anytime any is brought up, it is met with dismissal and defensiveness. One of the founding philosophies of this company was “Take care of your customers and employees first, and the profits will follow.” There has been some history of this department taking care of its employees. However, the more time that passes, the less care management shows for the employees.

Viewing 301 - 303 of 19,355 Reviews

Glassdoor has 34,065 Enterprise Mobility reviews submitted anonymously by Enterprise Mobility employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Enterprise Mobility is right for you.