Jaggaer reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(467 total reviews)

Andrew Roszko

91% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Jaggaer has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 467 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Jaggaer employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

467 reviews
5.0
Apr 3, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Select Site Development department is a really fun group to work with. I have read reviews from others that did not have a positive experience which leads me to believe they must have worked on one of the other development platforms. Also, the SelectSite development group did not have turn over on our Product Owner or Product Quality Analyst role in 2014. Again I'm not sure which group some of the negative reviews are coming from, but the SelectSite team is great place to work. We hired more people for new teams and promoted from within to fill those teams. The managers on the SelectSite platform have been very positive and I do experience good leadership from them. The team members on my four person team are knowledgeable and professional. I look forward to coming to work and enjoy my job. The company has allowed me to progress my skills and salary since I first joined in 2006. I started in customer support, then moved to quality assurance, then to product quality analyst and up to senior product quality analyst. SciQuest has recently built more job tiers for each role in the development department. Statements in other reviews saying that careers are flat do not match with my experience.

Cons

Would like to see the development department invest more in automated unit testing. Would like to see the department change to a newer product for version control. Would like to see more time spent teaching the development framework to new hire developers. It is a very custom framework and the resources available to a new hire for learning the framework on their own are severely lacking. We are depending too much on tribal knowledge and the hope that each team has a developer that is good at mentoring to a new hire.

1.0
Mar 31, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only pros about SciQuest would be that they offer a salary, so if you need a job, it's OK to work there while you look for something better (which shouldn't be hard to find). The company also has the best work-life balance you could have, which is great for being able to interview other places, which is very convenient.

Cons

Just don't work at SciQuest. Ask anyone in recruiting in the RTP area, and they have heard of how bad SciQuest is. When you interview at SciQuest, you may ask about Glassdoor or why the turnover is so ridiculously high. You will be told that Glassdoor just has a few bitter ex-employees who write repetitive reviews. You will be told that the turnover is high because people just don't like the change from a small company to a mid-size shop. I can't speak for the other Glassdoor posts, but I am a real, former Questie. I left in 2014, and this is my first review. The turnover is high because people hate working there. They hate that the CEO belittles people in public. They hate working for a place that is nothing more than a blame game. After three years, I could not take it anymore, and I left. Several months into my new company, and I only regret that I stuck around SciQuest as long as I did. So addressing the main areas on Glassdoor: Career Opportunities: the company is very flat, so you aren't going to have many chances to move up. However, because so many people leave, you may get to fill an empty role. That will give you a few weeks without a finger pointing your way. Compensation and Benefits: Comp is on the lower side of average. The benefits are terrible, however. They have 401k matching that might be as low as startups. Canes hockey tickets? I guess that's a perk, but I cared more about being able to retire comfortably. Work-life balance: as I said before, that is great. However, it's great because most people there just don't care, and they will work about 35 hours a week. No one pays any attention, either. So use that time to interview for other jobs. Senior Management: does this refer to the 50 Vice Presidents in a company of 500 people? If so, the vast majority of them are terrible. They do not know how to lead, they cannot run a company, and they are only in those positions so that they can grab a fancy VP title to put on their resumes. Culture & Values: To even give people an option of more than 1 star for SciQuest is laughable. As I was told back in 2011 at my first week on the job "Do not trust HR, here" Some of your co-workers are great. I could not name a VP that I would want to see in another company. That should say it all. Do not work at SciQuest. Unless you are a a terrible human, you deserve better.

1.0
Feb 17, 2015

A Sad Caste Society

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Others before me have expressed SciQuest's redeeming features well: free soda in the (now quasi-monitored) breakrooms, free coffee and video game machines that people are now afraid to play (but once were encouraged to do so).

Cons

It is a company that will kill your soul. They talk about "accountability" but you need to understand that that concept applies only to those below the top leadership. At one time, employees sensed that there was a true commitment to the customers and their satisfaction and success. That perspective was long gone after the IPO. Again, others have commented about the CEO and his demeanor and vocabulary. All of that is true.

Viewing 394 - 396 of 467 Reviews

Glassdoor has 524 Jaggaer reviews submitted anonymously by Jaggaer employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Jaggaer is right for you.