LinkedIn reviews

3.8

66% would recommend to a friend

(7,666 total reviews)
avatar

Ryan Roslansky

66% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

LinkedIn has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 7,666 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The LinkedIn employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
2.0
Jul 30, 2025

Be very careful

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Benefits Modern office with flexible RTO policy Supportive Colleagues

Cons

Disillusionment with place in market. Day one I was told how proud I should be selling Saas, LinkedIn Sales Nav is not Saas. Extremely siloed structure so depending on segment, office and even manager your experience can vary wildly. For me I have to imagine I got close to as bad as it could get. Unrealistic targets are common and hitting is cause for celebration but then you’ll be reminded that this is the expectation despite 50% missing being the Sales Ops target. Avoid LSS like the plague.

3.0
May 29, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Still great food, still nice office, first level management still great

Cons

What used to make LinkedIn a dream company to work for is lost. We are now quantity over quality. It appears that decisions are made at a level that has no insight on or consideration for the actual operation. The focus is now only on profitability.

2.0
Mar 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Great benefits and compensation relative to your workload * MSFT stock * Good food * A few nice/smart people

Cons

* Leadership is just trying to keep the lights on and have no unique vision or ideas for the company, mainly just copies what other companies are doing. * Culture is all but dead post-pandemic over-hiring. * Many claims of being data-driven, but it really matters more who is presenting an idea than what the actual data says. * Mind-numbingly obvious organizational woes caused by bad incentives. Engineers aren't rewarded for eliminating bugs, reducing tech-debt, or intelligently leveraging existing open-source. Instead, build another terrible in-house tool, make it as inefficient as possible (so you can claim to "fix" it later), and get promo'd away rather than dealing with any of the unsustainable development decisions you made. Eschew any work that isn't related to your OKRs (as dumb and misguided as they may be) like helping other teams for the common good, because that doesn't matter towards promotions unless it gets to the point that too many people are actively complaining. Don't make your service more efficient to use less hardware, because it just means your team will have a smaller hardware budget next cycle. Managers are promoted for managing more people, so unsurprisingly there's way too much middle-management. * Weird fake positivity, a strong vibe of preferring to pretend that things are great rather fixing problems. Bringing up issues usually reflects more negatively on you than it does whoever caused them. * No accountability for bad decision making, failures are addressed by throwing people lower on the totem pole under the bus (or pretending they were actually a success by some measure that wouldn't stand up to any real scrutiny--which doesn't really happen, see the above).

Viewing 478 - 480 of 7,666 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,360 LinkedIn reviews submitted anonymously by LinkedIn employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if LinkedIn is right for you.