employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin Anonymous reviews

1.2

0% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

Not enough data to show CEO approval

7% positive business outlook

Anonymous employees have rated Lockheed Martin with 1.2 out of 5 stars, based on 17 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Anonymous professionals have a poor working experience there. Lockheed Martin is rated 67% below average by Anonymous professionals compared to other employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

17 reviews
3.0
May 30, 2016

ALIS F35 sweat shop

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company overall. Many on-site options.. nurse, bank, food. Benefits are good. The facility is not very difficult to get to since it is right off the highway.

Cons

Your happiness here may be project based. For ALIS F35 - Absolutely zero consideration for employee work life balance on ALIS F35 project. General consensus is if you don't like it leave. Yes they pay OT without a time gate. However its only hourly not time and a half. Company claims to run a 9x80 flex. You will most likely work 10-12x120.

4.0
Apr 4, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to advance and receive merit-based pay increases. I was given wide latitude in decision-making and learned a lot on the job.

Cons

It is not the same corporation. They have restructured their portfolio and sold-off their IT company (IS&GS) and all the IT work except for what support their core business: manufacturing of things that fly, float, or explode. The year prior to this they enacted a matrix management organization which was a disaster and hugely expensive to the programs. LM is not the only corporation doing this. The services sector is too competitive and low-margin for these large corporations to survive. Defense materiel is more lucrative to the shareholders.

1.0
Jan 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

401K offered and matched up to 6%. Employee Scholar Program currently offered is beneficial, although it has changed drastically in 2015. Middle Management works hard to ensure direct report employees are taken care of to the best of their ability. Original Keystone Helicopter Managers that survived the Sikorsky buyout are some of the best in the business, but limited remain due to recent layoff in September 2015. The remaining maintenance techs and avionics techs that survived the recent layoff in Sept 2015 are some of the best in the business.

Cons

Senior Leadership is not checked in, and have run this once powerful asset into the ground in the Commercial Helicopter Production/Completions group. The senior leadership position in Operations was filled with management from the northern facility, with no experience in Corporate Aircraft Production/Completions. Absolutely zero time by this position is spent on the floor with middle management and technicians to ensure a positive team atmosphere. Nepotism from Operations Senior Leadership has invoked fear and confusion by bringing in former friends from previous leadership roles within the business located outside of Coatesville. Operations Senior Leadership conducts business by intimidation, screaming and yelling in meetings, and expectations are not at all understood due to lack of knowledge within this position. The senior leadership in Operations has incurred severe ethics violations which have been egregious violations completely ignored by the H.R. group as well as the B.P.O office due to the impending layoffs known by senior management in September of 2015. The H.R. group is not at all engaged with the employees, and their focus is to ensure Senior Management as well as the company are protected, at the cost of the employees. The recent layoff in September of 2015 was carried out in extremely poor fashion, and some of the most experienced managers and technicians were let go without regard to seniority or performance feedback scores. Nepotism was clearly evident with the recent layoff in September of 2015, as several of the "new" managers that were brought in by the Operations Senior leadership, with less than one year of tenure, were kept, and managers as well as employees that were laid off had experience levels that far surpassed any experience by those retained. Communication by Operations Senior Leadership is extremely poor, and the "silo mentality" is clearly evident. The recent layoff in September of 2015 was conducted in poor fashion, and over 200 highly experienced managers and technicians were laid off. Severance packages were given with specific details expressing that re-hire would invoke forfeiture of severance awarded, yet minority employees were re-hired without re-payment of severance. The S-92 and S-76D production have dwindled to less than 1/4 of the normal production of previous years, and the Light Helicopter Program is an abomination which was completely ignored by Operations Senior Leadership, and the existing manager, an employee with high accolades and experience, was subsequently laid off due to the lack of attention by Operations Senior Leadership. Managers with many years of military and corporate production experience were laid off with no regard to their tenure or performance evaluation scores, and their positions have been filled with the remaining non-experienced employees with no experience in production aircraft builds. The recent layoff was blamed on oil price reduction reported by senior leadership, yet the new S-76D aircraft deliverables were extremely late, with customers backing out of contract due to production dates being pushed out by Operations Senior Leadership's inability to manage the process. The business is a revolving door, and loss of employees by attrition is abundant. Current employees are looking for gainful employment elsewhere since the recent layoff, and communication by senior leadership is non-existent. The recent layoff in September of 2015 has affected some of the most highly experienced employees in a negative way. The families of these employees have been adversely affected, and the careers of some of the most experienced employees in aviation have been ruined due to the lack of leadership and insight by HR and Operations Senior Leadership. Middle Management has had to fend for themselves, and constant criticism by Operations Senior management is the norm. Senior Leadership within the Quality group is atrocious. A once powerful team of some of the best in aviation have been brought to their knees due to the mentality of the current senior leadership. This is not a company that is recommended for a future career in aviation anymore. It has been ruined by those that cannot seem to understand that the customer comes first, and the employees on the floor are the most valuable asset. The HR team is pathetic, and the BPO office is an abomination. Until the senior leadership is purged, this is not an employer of recommendation for anyone looking to enter or further their career in aviation today.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,701 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.