employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin reviews about "training"

73% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

620 reviews
1.0
Feb 7, 2015

Ethics? What ethics?

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- 40 hour / week job most of the time. - Flexible schedule to accommodate personal errands during the week. - Every other Friday off. - Slow and easy work pace if you want, like a lot of people do, or tons of work if that's how you are.

Cons

- Massive layoffs, with incorrect selection of who should be let go. - Required training modules every year, or more frequently for some topics. - Lots of unethical practices at all levels, from Engineers to VPs. I upheld the company's values as they're taught in the training modules. When I witnessed unethical practices and shady dealings with outside companies, I gathered evidence and built my case. In the end, I was told to drop it. The company stole an employee's invention, stripped him of any credit, added him to the layoff list nearly 10 times, and bled him dry in court. Lots of funding and projects being taken from West Coast facilities and rebased on the East Coast, resulting in waves of people on the West losing jobs. VP visited the campus one day, said he was the one fighting tooth and nail to keep R&D funding in San Jose. The very next day, funding for one of the more promising R&D projects was cut, and everyone on the project was on the layoff list. The list goes on and on. - Lots of slackers at the lower levels. People burning through government-billable hours, doing nothing. - Benefits are a joke after all the budget cuts. - Security clearances needed. Little to no jobs available if you aren't cleared. - Can't get into the interesting projects unless you're part of the inner circle. It's also not possible to get rid of underachievers who are in the inner circle. - People promoted to positions they aren't qualified for. - Consultants given no respect. If a consultant saves a project, a permanent employee will be given the credit. You don't give the medal to the arsonist who started the fire. You give it to the firefighter. Period.

2.0
Feb 27, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are probably worse places to work as a Finance professional Decent work/life balance, entirely dependent on function and segment of company

Cons

No training Company is now being VERY stingy with promotions Performance review process is not transparent Slow pace Conservative culture Low salary for job description and location Dearth of opportunities not related to Earned Value Management, which is not a skill transferable to any other industry worth mentioning

5.0
Mar 21, 2015

Former Systems Analyst, Systems Integrator and Engineering Manager

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great experience to grow and move about. Nice diversity and opportunity to work with people of all ages and backgrounds.

Cons

The best talent does not stay long. Experienced professionals come from other competitors and not from within the company. Training for employees is not as frequent or available as before.

2.0
Feb 27, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

LM was a great company to start one's career at (back in the day): there were training programs, tuition assistance, leadership development, and a huge network and ways to grow yourself and a career. Work/life balance was one thing I have been very happy about while here.

Cons

Defense and Space industry dynamics (current administration, state of government, who was primary customer of a lot of the products) has resulted in a huge market downturn that although LM is trying to stay the main leader in the sector (and so far, is the leader), the future is grim because customers (military, government, commercial) just don't have as many projects (nor can they afford it) as before. So companies like LM have really had to adapt (read: shrink, consolidate, and make cuts) which have affected employee morale (negatively). The removal of pension accrual after 2016 and 2020 and cuts to retiree medical benefit, plus the overly cumbersome Performance Review system (designed to keep post-layoff liability to a minimum perhaps), plus the non-competitive wages for the AREA (not the defense industry sector, but the geographic area) has driven many younger and mid-career employees' attrition, while late-career employees either have to try to 'hang on' until retirement is feasible or at maximum benefit (the most pension you can get at that point, since it won't increase any more with more years of service). Facilities are closing (and will continue to close) in the coming few years, which will translate to more headcount reduction. But it's really the lack of the country's space projects (in last 10 years) that have made this company less attractive to many. For prospective job seekers: something I did not expect working here was the negative reputation this company is associated with the peaceniks. (Although I think misinformed), weapons protesters are not uncommon and I've had friends drop association with me for the connection (even though I worked on Space projects.)

1.0
Feb 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Discounts on outside companies (but not any better than what is at any other large company) -Allow for telecommute

Cons

- Management doesn't care about employees at all. treat you like a cog in a machine that can be replaced easily. - Benefits are horrible and defined pension plan is gone and good luck figuring how to do better with 401k. - Health insurance is bad and getting worse. - No advancement at all. Stuck pretty much where you join. Also pay raises are bad. Give everyone coming in the door a raise but screw over all current employees (treating you like cookie cutter). - Don't listen to anything you say unless it is what they want to hear. They will treat you bad to make numbers or work you into the ground so they fail then justify to hire more people after the fail and they have burned you out. - Have you work the extra hours (as salary) and then if you don't use in that week you lose the chance to take some of the extra hours banked off later. (Work life balance is not here) - Training is non-existent. Fight tooth and nail every year to get any. Even in the cyber security world where you need for professional certs good luck in getting unless you are a buddy. - Evals are large company usual 10% outstanding and 80% normal and 10% dirt bag. Every year no matter what. Waste a lot of time for almost no raise and writing up just bunk to not get the bottom 10% (they already know who the favorite is and going to be in top 10%) - They only do enough (in cyber security) not to get into trouble. Unless you are the chosen few no chance to actually do anything interesting. Just going thru the motions to make it look good. Never listen to what anyone tells them things are not right. Just wear you down to where you stop saying anything to them about how bad things are. - Overall they just don't care about employees and they don't like being told what they are doing wrong. management is just out for themselves and will throw you under the bus in seconds. Any good managers leave as soon as they see how things are going. Employees always feel under the gun that the boss will ride you because they don't like you or won't go with what they want. Company has been going down hill for sometime and seems to be picking up speed. Glad to leave and happy with new company.

3.0
Feb 9, 2015

Software Engineering Manager

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work-life balance, cool National Security, Space Exploration, etc. projects, extensive trainings/materials for new employees.

Cons

Process intensive, legacy technologies/systems, difficult to inject new concepts/ideas/technologies, not engineering focused due to the nature of some government contracts

2.0
Mar 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-There are some highly intelligent employees and they are willing to mentor you. They are rarely in management though. -Occasionally you are really able to complete fulfilling work for your country

Cons

-ZERO investment in increasing talent of employees (no more available classes, on the job training is frowned upon) -Raises are nonexistent -Benefits are below average and seem to be getting worse -Project leads are incompetent, unprofessional, have no training, are not able to perform under pressure and very poor decision makers. -Ranking system: inconsistent and ineffective. Doesn't seem to motivate employees to do better work. -Short term profit - it seems that upper management is only interested in profits in the next quarter. They are willing to sell their (1 year distant) future away for a small profit now

Viewing 142 - 144 of 620 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,704 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.