Nagarro reviews

Thank you for your review. I have to unfortunately disagree with several points that you have made in the cons section. First of all, there is no management bias - how can there be? Don't we need QAs to run our business - if yes, then we will likely take equal care of them; and we do. There is a dedicated COE for quality assurance led by a VP and a Director. We are looking for very senior folks to hire in the QA track so that we can make it formidable independent practice. We get a lot of questions about pay scales for QAs. I looked at our hiring data for QA in the last 12 months. We pay significantly above the current pay scales for people we hire in order to align with what our pay scale for QA is. I don't think we do too badly in this area at all. At the same time, we sometimes are driven by the needs of the industry, and so variations in pay scales or onsite opportunities are things that are driven by external factors. While sometimes it may not seem like it, HR at Nagarro is looking out for employees much more than business units and managers. Some of our key structures are designed to allow this to happen. But, if you have faced a situation differently, then I would like to meet you to understand what happened better. Yes, we don't have free cabs and meals (they are subsidized though). I don't think we are ruining anyone's career at all. In fact, Nagarro is probably the best services company to be in at this time. We are growing tremendously and with this growth comes a lot of opportunity. I recommend that you reach out to me if you would like to have an open discussion and I will be happy to meet you. Once again, thank you for your time.

Thank you for taking the time to leave feedback. It is unfortunate that you had to leave us with such an impression of us. I agree that we have some of the best people in the senior management team. There are many other pros of course. However, let me respond to some of the areas that you feel we can do better in. While we do have a culture where we like to work hard, on average we do not have such working hours that you describe in your review. Yes, there may be projects which run into timeline challenges, but this is not the norm. On average (when I look at the data for time spent in office), people are not spending more than 40-50 hours in office. I do believe that in our industry (which is fast paced and ever-changing), we shouldn't measure the health of our employment in 2-3 month intervals. There will always be challenges and tough projects. I believe that we should measure this health over 1-2 year periods. Your experience with us was poor, and I am sorry for that. But once again, that is not the norm. I wish you had given us more time. The percentage of our "homegrown" managers is really low. Over 50% of the people in Nagarro are less than 5 years old in the company. We recognize that if we are to grow and do bigger things, we need help from people who have done this - and hence we recruit heavily at senior levels from outside. We are on our way to be something special and big. And yes, for this we have to restructure our processes and reinvent ourselves (as you suggest) - and we are doing that. We do want to make life easier for all. Once again, thank you for taking the time to provide this feedback. It does help us.