Northrop Grumman Principal Software Engineer reviews

3.8

85% would recommend to a friend

(100 total reviews)
avatar

Kathy Warden

85% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

Principal Software Engineer employees have rated Northrop Grumman with 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 100 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Principal Software Engineer professionals have a good working experience there. Northrop Grumman is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Principal Software Engineer professionals compared to other employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

100 reviews
2.0
Apr 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Low expectation. A lot of people just coast and do minimum work. Easy to be a top performer here. Excellent work life balance.

Cons

Poor tooling. Management think letting software engineers use 10+ years old desktops is acceptable. No career growth. Outdated tech stack. Executives and VPs are not taking software development seriously. Keep losing software contracts so not a stable job for software engineers. Fails to retain smart people.

3.0
Mar 5, 2026

Job Security

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They do an excellent job with relocating you internally if a contract falls through instead of just letting you go

Cons

Very difficult to promote pass a level 2. You could be outperforming your job title but if you're 1 year short of their "minimum years" requirement, you wont get promoted. Their total pay range is dishonest. If the range is 100k-200k, you will never see the 200k. They will put you below 150k to start, make it difficult to get to the mid point, and then give you a lower raise to keep you as close to the mid point as possible.

4.0
Mar 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Amazing WLB - no micromanaging 2. Fireproof - I’ve never even heard of anyone getting fired here and Id expect this is especially true if you have program clearance (SAP) 3. Pay is livable - nothing spectacular but you can live off of it 4. Learning opportunities - You may be able to learn a little from some projects 5. Critical, National Security projects 6. Predictable, reliable leveling comes with YOE

Cons

Lower pay - the pay is much less than the tech industry, otherwise similar to others within industry Boring - I find myself atrophying with my technical aptitude when assigned tasks on projects that are decades old Tenure-based - level is largely based on YOE instead of contribution or ability RTO - I personally have been given projects that are remote and given projects that exist within a SCIF (no phones, no external internet on classified system) and projects within a SCIF can only be worked on-site Red Tape - updating classified software with unclassified software is not going to happen with existing projects, and even for newer projects, it takes a few months to even get it inside to start testing with real data and is usually not realistic for a newer-project timeline Coworker variance - some coworkers enjoy the work, are good at it, and know what they’re doing. Others do not nor do they care.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 100 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,043 Northrop Grumman reviews submitted anonymously by Northrop Grumman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Northrop Grumman is right for you.