Sage reviews

3.5

63% would recommend to a friend

(5,257 total reviews)
avatar

Steve Hare

70% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

Sage has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 5,257 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Sage employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informationstechnologie industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

5K reviews
1.0
Aug 2, 2017

What a shame

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits including matched pension up to 10%, 5 days training, 5 days charity, great building, working with some seriously talented people.

Cons

As a developer at Sage, you will not be given time to create great code that works bug free. Instead, you’ll be under immense pressure and will have crazy deadlines for no apparent reason, sometimes bordering on the ridiculous. As a developer, you’ll be asked for estimates for development tasks, if middle management don’t like the number you’ll be given roughly half the time or they will ask someone else for a ‘better’ estimate. When things inevitably overrun, the finger will be pointed at you. In Sage, if you’re not in the old boys club (not currently accepting new members), you will never be afforded opportunities to work on bleeding edge stuff, you will however need to maintain any rubbish that they have created, forever. In Sage, if you have a track record of failure, being completely and utterly incompetent, but you kiss backside like a champion (or play golf with the boss), you’ll be promoted. Meanwhile, the very best people are either chipped away until they are a mere shadow of their former self, or leave. In Sage, you have objectives, competencies and other performance related noise that must be fulfilled, even if it means your day job suffers. You will be ‘calibrated’ against your peers to see where you sit on the bell curve of greatness. As others have mentioned, some people are going to be artificially placed on the bottom and top of the curve, which you know, is immoral, we’re talking about people with families here! In Sage, we used to have a yearly, anonymous ‘employer survey’ which included a free text section so you could be more expressive about your role. You opinion really did matter back them. Now, we’ve had a mandatory ‘temperature check’ that is *not anonymous*, includes carefully selected questions, and does not allow free text. More recently, we’ve had another survey which again, is targeted and asked such quested as: Give 3 words why you think Sage is great. What! Last year… In Sage, you may have been asked to attend a mandatory department meeting and be told when you get back to your desk you may have a ‘you’re being made redundant’ email and if you don’t receive this email, you’re ok. An Email! I’m not making this up, check google. Just let that lest point sink in… All of this is such a shame. Sage has the ability to be a great place to work, it used to be. Over the years we’ve lost all the good leaders, they’ve all been replaced with journey-men-middle-managers. Managers who have zero people skills. Managers who don’t understand technology, yet are running a technology teams. Managers who are not pulling in the same direction as the top leadership, in- fight and thrive in a blame culture. Middle managers who behaviour like dictators and do only what they want to do irrespective of what their *professional* team think. What a shame!

1.0
Jul 16, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great front line staff and very good internal training department. Very good internal support in the form of TSL. Both of which are stretched too thin, but excellent none the less.

Cons

All staff, including those who are technical leaning and even from academic backgrounds are expected to make and increase sales. Over the course of the last year this has become mandatory, and indeed, it's even possible to lose your job by not having enough sales leads convert. Excellent at customer service? Whiz kid with computers and software? Sorry, not enough sales, out you go. Targets are generally impossible to hit consistently and don't take into account individuals circumstances or issues that are completely out of the control of call agents. You can actually get put on a performance plan if enough customers complain about queue times and mark down your CSAT. Even though the problem was fixed and the agent did everything that was reasonably practicable, or if they didn't like the answer they got, or the fix they were given (even if it was the correct answer). If they'd been messed about all day and you were the last guy to help – and fixed it – but they sent a bad survey for you, that's just bad luck. Colleagues are forced to cut down average handling time, and as such the customers lose out. This is probably the single biggest problem. A massive number of calls we get are from people who've already called us that same day (or week), who could have probably had their issue fixed first time around, if the first advisor was incentivised to see the problem through to conclusion. Because of the constant pressure to reduce handling time, agents rather than trying to help resolve the issue, most of the time are looking for the fastest way to end the call, regardless of whether or not the issue was resolved. The most common way to do this is to 'offer an article', which is fine, if the person you're giving it to is receptive to this. But most customers are not, or will accept it, and call back several more times because they didn't understand it, or because the steps on the article didn't fix it. Normally it's because they didn't understand. There's a huge push for customers to 'self serve', which is shocking really, considering how much they pay for technical support, but what's worse is many of the people who call are not capable of following the instructions in the articles we send out, many processes are not 'that' simple, and sending someone off (if they don't immediately want to speak to a manager when you try and palm them off) often results in that same customer calling back several times, becoming frustrated, losing trust in the brand and leaving or having their opinion of us permanently damaged. As an aside to this, assuming for a moment, that I agreed with technical support staff having a 'converted leads' target, everyone seems to be totally ignoring the obvious contradiction between AHT/CPH and Converted Leads.

avatar
Sage Response
8y
Thanks for your review. Our people at Sage are fantastic and it doesn’t surprise us to read you think the same – they are professional, and do a great job of supporting our customers. This involves not only solving problems but providing great advice and being commercially savvy enough to identify new products and services that help customers build their business. Our best Technicians do this extremely well, ensuring that even complex customer needs are fully met. As a current colleague you’ll be well aware of that we are striving to be a high performing team who operate efficiently and deliver great customer experiences. The overwhelming majority of our Customer Service Technicians do this well and achieve their objectives, this is clear from the superb customer satisfaction and first call resolution scores our customers award us. There is absolutely no doubt that the Technician role is a demanding one where you need to be creative, resilient and customer focused, however the opportunity to mature, develop and build a successful career is fantastic. The quality and success of our CS Technicians is demonstrated by how many go on to build very successful careers within Sage across a whole variety of functions. Many progress into Marketing, Product Development, Technology and Sales. Our aim is to continue to strive to be the best, to change and develop as the competitive environment changes. Our Customer Service colleagues are central to this and we value them incredibly highly, though we fully understand that we need to continuously build the right conditions that enable all of our colleagues perform successfully. As you know we have just finished our Your Voice colleague survey as well as held a number of focus groups across the globe - we will share the results and actions at our FY18 Kick Offs. Thanks again for your feedback.
1.0
Apr 18, 2017

Gone downhill over the last 2 years

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- People on the Ground and 'Old Sage' are great. They are invested in their colleagues and customers and interested in doing the best for both of them. - Sharesave, Reward Gateway and the other benefits are very good - Offices have good facilities available

Cons

Having worked for Sage for a number of years, I always used to sing their praises as an employer and would regularly defend them against any criticism. However, over the last 2 -3 years I have seen a huge turnaround in Sage's attitude towards its employees. It no longer feels like you're cared for and employees are now merely a number. This seems to be the new strategy in order to push employees as far as possible to increase profit and please the shareholders. The senior management also seem make decisions based on personal agendas rather than what is best for the company and its customers. Its a shame people like Jacqueline have left as they seem to be managers that actually care about employees. Pay is also well below industry standard.

avatar
Sage Response
9y
Thanks for your feedback. We know our people are important to us and recognise each and every colleague whether the 'old Sage' (as you refer to them) or new ones play an important part in our future...all people are valued and we want you to achieve to your full potential. With respect to salary, commission and targets we believe that we are competitive in the market and that there is plenty of opportunity to become successful and earn, plus excel.
Viewing 94 - 96 of 5,257 Reviews

Glassdoor has 6,278 Sage reviews submitted anonymously by Sage employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Sage is right for you.