employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Engaged Employer

Thermo Fisher Scientific reviews

3.5

62% would recommend to a friend

(12,605 total reviews)
avatar

Marc N. Casper

69% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Thermo Fisher Scientific has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 12,605 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Thermo Fisher Scientific employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmazeutika & Biotechnologie industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

13K reviews
1.0
May 23, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Fantastic 401K match and the vesting period is short compared with competitors - Great resources (ability to get lab supplies at or near cost) - Company hosts many exciting events and workshops throughout the year and are great opportunities to gain skills or volunteer - Company is very lean, and is heavily focused on data metrics and KPIs, I really appreciated the focus on continuous improvement - The education scholarship is generous, albeit more restrictive compared with other employers - Healthcare offerings are variable depending on the group and region, some pre-merger legacy plans that Thermo has retained are truly unmatched - Company has a relatively young, vibrant workforce and is growing - On-site amenities, including gym and cafeteria (where available) are cheap and accessible - WFH flexibility is great if you get the right manager and department

Cons

- PTO policy, though on the surface fairly generous at 3 weeks starting, is inflexible and difficult to navigate in my experience compared with competitors (example: maternity leave) - The company is an agglomeration of a number of smaller companies that were the product of Thermo's buying binge over the past couple of years. There remains quite a bit of overlap and silos that result in unnecessary duplication of functions and resources, territory disputes, office politics, and communication challenges. Except for a very few functions, expect to be frustrated by this on a regular basis. - Advancement opportunities are lacking and raises are paltry compared with competitors. The company does emphasize "lateral moves" into other roles, which I appreciatively took advantage of during my career at Thermo Fisher. However, in my own experience many times this resulted in others coming in who were completely unfamiliar with a product line that took on a management or oversight role where they have no clear idea what the product really is, how it is used, or how it is manufactured. It is also exhausting to have to re-introduce yourself to your new manager and to justify your existence and importance to the team if you're doing it 3-4 times a year. - The websites are truly an absolute dumpster fire and the company has no easy solutions to address it. It is difficult to get a customer interested in a product when they themselves cannot find it on the website. - Constant instability, turnover, layoffs that weren’t fully thought through, and unrealistic expectations. As a result, there was frequently a lot of friction and resulting drama between on-site employees or underhanded tactics from mid-level managers that subsequently amplified the drama and hampered productivity (i.e. artificially inflating numbers, stealing resources and materials from other groups in the middle of the night to "hold down the budget"). - The open-plan office space and dearth of conference and huddle rooms at many larger sites make it logistically difficult to schedule and hold meetings - Many of the Senior Directors and VP's seem to have an almost "Cult of Personality" problem. While Thermo Fisher has a top-notch Internal Communications and PR Shop, the focus on AV, bright lights, and showmanship versus more open, honest dialogue and communication results in it being an uninformative pablum. Why does there need to be a DJ and produced light show at a site's quarterly Town Hall discussing company performance? Isn't that a bit excessive? Why does the Leadership and Marketing Teams need to frequently come in and disrupt the lab operation to "play act" science for the camera? If you have a question or concern regarding a decision being rolled out from the top, do not expect a speedy or satisfying answer, or even a forum to gain further clarity - I did experience the ultimate insult of finding out I was about to be laid off but before that was going to happen, I was asked to train my replacement on another continent.

2.0
Oct 2, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Long work hours. Job stability. Free espresso machine. Great experience for new grads to learn something in the industry.

Cons

Long work days. Salary positions are horrible for 10-13 hour work days. Promotions happen to those that work long days. They maybe inefficient with their work load, but in eyes of management; they're hard workers. 10-15% paycut compared to it's competitors in Bay Area. Don't work here if you're trying to feed a family. But great place for new grads to take a paycut and learn industry work.

avatar
Thermo Fisher Scientific Response
7y
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We wish you all the best in your next chapter.
1.0
May 25, 2018

Beware

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have a job, I guess Don't have to work under Don Kania anymore *COUGHselloutCOUGH*

Cons

beware if your company is bought out by Thermo Fisher, they start out the same and within 2 years, benefits are reduced, PTO cut down, policy changes that "align " with thermo fisher. Get out before the changes

Viewing 52 - 54 of 12,605 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,470 Thermo Fisher Scientific reviews submitted anonymously by Thermo Fisher Scientific employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Thermo Fisher Scientific is right for you.