Nagarro reviews

Dear colleague, As you know, we have ruled out internal project interviews for people who have joined in the last 6 months or those who are new to the industry. But we still have clients who want to meet and even screen the people they will be working with. We work in several different formats. Maybe 5-10 percent of our business is indeed staff augmentation, typically with strategically important clients only. But a client person having a PO and/or architect role on a project doesn’t make the work staff augmentation for us. We can’t expect a client to hand over, eg, a major flight planning system for us to develop end to end just on our own! Most of our clients are also technical and don’t want to be reduced to just marketing and sales teams. I fully agree with their thinking. Personally, I don’t think anyone would pay Nagarro’s billing rates for staff augmentation alone. A lot of Nagarro processes and capabilities (eg through the COEs) are always at play. That’s what makes projects succeed and that’s what clients pay for.

Dear colleague - thanks for giving us feedback here on Glassdoor (I also urge you to reach HR for each of the cons or issues that you have mentioned here). The buildings being separate is something that we cannot fully get away within the near future, but more and more of our work is being modeled such that you don't have to move too much between buildings within a day. We encourage everyone to meet over Skype using video when in different buildings (I do this several times a day - in fact, I am about to get on a call where participants will be from 3 different buildings). There has never been any place in Nagarro for "approach/jack" - but even more so, in the last few months, we have made several changes in the processes which removes the possibility of favoritism. Thanks for taking the time to provide feedback. Best regards.