Northrop Grumman reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(13,293 total reviews)
avatar

Kathy Warden

82% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Northrop Grumman has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 13,293 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Northrop Grumman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

13K reviews
1.0
Aug 20, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This used to be a great and motivating workplace. It still can be if we turn it around with the right leadership, while we still have our company reputation (and contracts) mostly intact.

Cons

Good and stable technical, functional, and program leadership has widely been forced out to make way for "diversity" candidates. The irony is this has resulted in much younger, less experienced choices of replacements who are themselves very ill equipped to manage a diverse workforce. They are struggling with their own jobs, particularly with the technical aspects of it as well as the finer points of genuine employee encouragement or measured discipline rather than the standard "check boxes of managing people" they get from various avenues of training. In many cases they assign themselves prime technical work to learn from, while neglecting real incentives for the older more experienced folks who are left with no choice but to either work under them or quit. They are selfish and they are not capable of communicating consistently or directly with their direct reports in meaningful ways. And this was before COVID-19. They do not incentivize them or form relationships with them, and they treat them as a means to an end, only. The result is they tend to isolate their older reports rather than engage them. In some cases, I have witnessed some management referring to older workers in general with derogatory language. This has left an entire technically proven and capable group with an unmotivating, defunct career path, since there is not room for them to also continue to develop technically nor develop along the leadership path. Functional and Program Leadership is broken because there is not a strong relationship chain among leadership. So even the capable leaders who do exist, particularly on programs, cannot function as such to their own direct reports because they cannot even trust their own leadership chain. I know first hand of many folks over the age of 45 who are on anti-depressants or seeking personal counseling because of this prolonged way in which the company has been mistreating them. In the last few years, I know of at least one case, possibly two, where additional personal or family issues have pushed someone over the edge and resulted in the loss of job or life. It is unfortunate that a once great work environment for career minded folks now is a place to also be survived rather than a place to thrive making top products.

1.0
Feb 16, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only pro was all the interviewing experience I received when applying to other jobs. It's giving me the motivation to leave.

Cons

Rebrand: The image is to represent cutting-edge (according to their website). I've personally seen the old processes and sub-par technologies this company develops. It is so far from cutting edge. They speak of Agile and Cloud as if they are the new tomorrow. Agile is 20th century, and Cloud was decades ago. These are not new concepts. But the company narrative is that they are leading the way with these buzzwords. When I first saw the logo, I thought, B2 bomber. But now that I think about it some more, it more accurately reflects a revenue graph. Investors, watch out for the suddenly drop. Contracts: I've personally been involved programs where the company lost several hundred millions of dollars to these long-term contracts10 years+. When the company wins a large contract, they shift the workforce to retain quality employees that would be otherwise be RIF'ed from these other programs. The company's narrative is we value our employees and will ensure they have jobs when the contract ends. What they don't say is that they only keep ones that have managerial status or seniority. Let's be honest, the company is arrogant. They are living off the successes of the past and failed to be competitive for the future. If you value yours, get the experience you need and get out. Integrity: This is probably the biggest pain-point for me about this company. They are dishonest, deceptive, and greedy. The company does not value their employees as people. HR needs to be rebranded to reflect their values, drop the Human part because they don't care about people, and only retain the Resource part because they value money. They see people as dollar signs and will lie to get employees to pay out of pocket for education that benefits the company. They also aren't honest on the contract. They only work enough to continue the current one or secure the next one. They don't want to deliver quality, only quality as needed by the contract. Here's another story from my personal experience to highlight why you shouldn't work for them. I reported an employee for ongoing sexual conduct which happened continually over the course of three years. The resolution of my report was management swept it under the rug as told me "accept their behavior because that's how some people just are." Those were literally the words given to me. I was in shock that was their view point. Also I've seen too often older employees prey upon new interns and hires. They perpetuate this behavior through selective hiring, employee groups, happy hour socializing, among the many occurrences that I've personally attended. Since the company values these predators, I urge new hires to seriously consider this as a decision factor.

3.0
Feb 13, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most people are truly focused on doing what is right for the customer and the company. Work culture is generally good. Most employees are at least generally competent. Some are truly outstanding.

Cons

For at least the last 7 years or so, the company has been so focused on getting more females and African Americans into the upper management ranks (director level) that there has been rampant discrimination against white males. This is an open secret that all management employees that have been at the company for at least 5 years can give many, many examples. White males are consistently told they need to check another box or two from an experience perspective even when the selected candidates don't check the boxes themselves. As a result, the competency level at the director and vice president level has plummeted. The company isn't anywhere nearly as well managed as it was 5-10 years ago.

Viewing 64 - 66 of 13,293 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,061 Northrop Grumman reviews submitted anonymously by Northrop Grumman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Northrop Grumman is right for you.