Northrop Grumman reviews

3.8

76% would recommend to a friend

(13,317 total reviews)
avatar

Kathy Warden

81% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Northrop Grumman has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 13,317 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Northrop Grumman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Luft- & Raumfahrt, Verteidigung industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

13K reviews
2.0
Feb 13, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Co-workers are nice, mostly men. Most often you will be the only woman of the team. If your job is project based (most jobs are), some co-workers will be insecure and try to withhold information so they will look good in front of management. Management are mostly men. They tend to think women are inferior technically. The women managers are even worse. They are insecure about their jobs and will push you down.

Cons

Women are not treated equally. Most managers cannot do programming so they chose to be managers. They won't be able to understand if you are facing a software problem and tend to blame the problems on you. The managers that are good technically tend to stay on the same project for a long time and forget how it feels to be on a new project. They expect you to understand everything despite the lack of documentation, or documentation not updated, etc... No promotion unless you apply for a new project which you will be a new person on the team. Work life balance is none. They expect you to come in on weekends and work late when needed with no extra pay.

1.0
Dec 31, 2016

Avoid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Really difficult to find something positive. Talent + for the one place to list employee career goals. Now if management and talent acquisition would use this tool correctly to move employees around within the company like they should.

Cons

Benefit cuts. Used to be 8% for a 401k match. Dropped to 4%. Healthcare skyrocketed. More and more tasks were added to job jar. Workers neither compensated or recognized for added tasks outside of job description. Performing multiple jobs and only paid for one. Talent Acquisition (TA) is woefully unskilled at finding talent within the company for placement in other positions. Zero assistance or placement provided to skilled employees with varied backgrounds and degrees. Severe lack of communication from management at all levels. Same issues are addressed yearly by a survey and nothing ever changes.

3.0
Jul 1, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary, benefits (although theses are eroded every couple years). Like any company, if you manage to find your technical niche or a good team, things can be pretty awesome. Great for folk in areas that don't feel compelled to innovate through bureaucracy or just want a 9 to 5. If you see yourself as an "idea person" that doesn't want to dig into the details, you'll fit in great. Decent starting out point for a career after which you'll get bored in 3 to 5 years. Many opportunities to advance given high attrition.

Cons

A tall and inverted management pyramid. Poor communication at all levels, information withholding. Competition between NG campuses and even between buildings and groups on the same campus. Not a good long term place for technically minded or younger/mid level engineers. High attrition with little loyalty/pride for current employees. The Dead Sea Effect (innovative folk evaporate, raising salinity, killing life) is in full effect. Lack of REAL technical expertise in key engineering areas leaves "leaders" who are glorified accountants or wannabe YouTube vloggers or well practiced sycophants. It's so bad in certain areas, they can't recognize/attract good hires because they don't have anyone truly versed in the state of the art to accurately gauge candidates' expertise. You will be treated as a number, especially every couple years when it's time to cut employee benefits and buy back more stocks/issue dividends. Even the laudable goals like "Diversity" are executed by management in a misguided, very prescriptive way that no one truly buys into, but games to increase their managers' numbers. The culture is not inclusive no matter how many metrics the CEO quotes in his video proclamations: it's an echo chamber. As executed, even as a "person of color" I felt dirty by it. Managers with strong preexisting, but subconscious racial biases subtly advance "their own" to counteract the wave of "diversity hires" they think others are forced to bring in. The culture of "metrics gaming" is so strong, I wouldn't put it past people to submit fake Glassdoor reviews to help out their "Engagement Metrics".

Viewing 157 - 159 of 13,317 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,087 Northrop Grumman reviews submitted anonymously by Northrop Grumman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Northrop Grumman is right for you.